Transportation has developed throughout the human history. First they walked then they ride horses and now most people ride cars. As we can see here as vehicles has developed the way human transport has changed. Now I believe we are close for another change of transportation.
The main reason I assert this is because transportation methods that were expensive are getting cheaper. Twenty years ago it cost a lot of money to even pay for a short trip using an airplane. However, because science development and airplanes getting more fuel efficient it is much more affordable for even normal people. Now it is no big deal if you are not taking a trip longer than 3 hours. Plus, it is much cheaper if you are not getting out of your country.
Also, we might soon see a different type of vehicle. There are news articles saying that a small flying vehicle is under development. If this new flying vehicle comes out of the market people will start to use this because it is much faster to fly and there will be no worry for traffic jams. Since this new type of vehicle will be much more efficient than riding a car more and more people will start to use this new vehicle and less cars. It is just like how people transition from horses to cars in the past.
Finally, it is evident that cars are destroying the environment and it is a global concern. Therefore, governments will try to make people use less cars. They will make policies to encourage people to use public transportation and advertise people to walk short distance. As people get educated by this agenda more and more people will start finding different ways of transportation. Overall, less people will drive their car out to the streets.
To sum up, scientific enhancement has made advance transportation more affordable to people and even further enough to introduce new types of transportation, on top of that people will be educated to use less cars. Thus, it is clear to me that in twenty years there will be fewer cars out the streets compare to today.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 80
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship 83
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ou are not getting out of your country. Also, we might soon see a different typ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... will start to use this new vehicle and less cars. It is just like how people transi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...governments will try to make people use less cars. They will make policies to encour...
^^^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ferent ways of transportation. Overall, less people will drive their car out to the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... of that people will be educated to use less cars. Thus, it is clear to me that in t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68715083799 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65354895491 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.292438097 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9047619048 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0476190476 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14502023144 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477868600141 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052614462384 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088301092866 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539248017267 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.