Nowadays, people can get anything they want easier than before. This makes life more comfortable for us than our grandparents. I can give several reasons why, the first one is technology and the second one is science. Although no one can think of technology and science as separate subjects, both can contribute differently to our lives.
First of all, technological developments shorten the time of actions that our grandparents were doing for the same thing. For example, communication, it was very hard to send a letter to loved ones. However, since smartphones dominate society, everybody has one, and one person can contact anyone on earth in seconds. Moreover, thanks to the development of the internet, we can obtain any information within seconds on the internet. Whereas, our parents had to dig into the library and seek for the correct encyclopedia to find the information of interest. On the other hand, for example, I am a researcher, and I can find lots of recent developments in my area in the same breadth I type in search engines, such as Google. Therefore, I believe that I am more comfortable with my life since I can contact or get information immediately thanks to technology.
Secondly, science has been improved since the last century. Indeed, medicine is one of the areas that can be concerned. For instance, in the late 90s, a drug was developed to repress the effect of the HIV-virus, so that infected people could live as comfortably as uninfected ones. Unfortunately, our grandparents lived in the period when medicine hasn’t been inclined this much. Right now, there are a lot of treatments, with their alternatives, for lots of diseases. In addition, engineering has been developed thanks to physical science. If it wasn’t for physics, engineers wouldn’t build huge factories to provide supply chains, which indirectly helps us to produce lots of products in a short time. On the other hand, our grandparents had to produce one shoe in a day, which is a long time period considering an average factory today produces dozens of shoes. Hence, developments in science brought comfort to our lives.
Overall, I believe that today life is more comfortable than what our elders lived, thanks to science and technology. I hope, today, we contribute to them so that our grandchildren can live a more comfortable life in the future.
- TPO 17 – Independent: A/D? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 76
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Us 76
- TPO 22 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Altruism is a type of behaviour in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1978.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04591836735 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9948762298 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533163265306 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6433202857 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115924529965 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386518577882 0.076458572812 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432288282625 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874968335224 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379292190594 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.