We are living in a modern society with technology touching almost every aspect of our lives. Technologies bring about many benefits. Therefore, people raise question whether life today is easier and more enjoyable than it was in the past. People have different opinions about this issue. In my point of view, I strongly believe that our lives today are more comfortable than ever before. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, technologies help to produce many kinds of medicines that enable people to have a healthier life. Compared to the past, when the devices in the hospitals were not advanced as we have today, and the lack of medicines as well as antivirus, many people died because of basic diseases and virus. However, today researchers detect many kind of medicines and vaccines that can destroy the virus. Therefore, patients have better treatment. Likewise, there are various kinds of vitamins and medicines that support people to live healthier than before.
Alongside the elaborated reason above, another idea that is noteworthy to consider is that today people's lives are more convenient than ever before. In the past, people had to work hard by using their energy without the assistance of any machine. People did not have enough food to eat. Their lives were dependent on nature. However, today most people use machine to support their work. As far as I know, most family have washing machine and vacuum that help people washing their clothes and cleaning their houses. Most houses have air conditioners that enable people to adjust the temperature to be suitable for them. Likewise, there are many entertainments that allow people to relax and entertain themselves. They are able to enjoy their hobbies. As a result, life seems to be very enjoyable.
In conclusion, people have their own opinions about question whether people today have an enjoyable life than people in the past did. For two aforementioned reasons, I completely support the idea that it is true that people today have an easy and comfortable life thanks to the assistance of technologies.
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 60
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 60
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 66
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 71
- TPO-01 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiri 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 342, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...irus. However, today researchers detect many kind of medicines and vaccines that can dest...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, likewise, so, therefore, well, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04249291785 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58611524088 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512747875354 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2784102521 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.3913043478 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.347826087 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73913043478 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119764308841 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400768824168 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445150452078 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884909707599 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367303726199 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.