The reading passage and the lecture both talk about the eco-certification of the American wood company, where the reading passage shows eco-certification has no good effect on the customer, so that the American wood company might not care about eco-certification for the wood product. But the lecture opposes the reading passage by providing his support on the advantage of eco-certification and he thinks that American wood company should accept eco-certification for a clean and natural environment.
First, the lecturer suggests that the American customer, obviously, doesn’t treat every advertisement exactly same ways. Since the American customer has the mind to separate the good or bad advertising for the product, they might keep their trust on the eco-certification wood advertisement, at the same time show up a friendly behavior to the eco-certification accepted company.
Second, the lecturer says that it is very natural that everybody pays attention to the prices, but if the price differences remain under 5% then the customer might choose the good product although it has the higher price. So the lecturer is very much confident that the American customer wants to buy the eco-certified wood product rather than a normal wood product.
In the last, lecturer mentions that the American company must provide attention about their business on own country and the abroad as well. Because, if they do not care about their own customer then in this competing world, the other company from abroad will take the advantage that they will start their own business in America and if that happened then it would be worse for the whole Americans
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth century Dutch painters However there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him One such painting is known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet The pa 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were cap 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- TPO-07 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... so that the American wood company might not care about eco-certification for the...
^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... business on own country and the abroad also. Because, if they do not care about the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1977.66487455 70% => OK
No of words: 258.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12817352831 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7041389583 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.0 100.406767564 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0431546279555 0.236089414692 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212070922981 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0192082934086 0.0737576698707 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0269507729268 0.150856017488 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0102385016822 0.0645574589148 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 11.7677419355 171% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 58.1214874552 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.