Nowadays, knowledge is the key to a successful life, it provides a gateway for our higher education. While there are advantageous to both having broad knowledge of many academic subjects or specialize in one specific subject. I believed that specializing in one subject has more benefit because it anticipates solid focus and precise thought.
Firstly, a focus is the key to learning the concept of the new idea, which most of the students have difficulty to achieve. So, A variety of new methods has been explored by teachers who wish to improve the qulity of teaching. As I studied English in the language school, I had struggled with understanding English which makes me anxious through each session. Then, I had attempted to practice more and did not work for me. Thus, I scheduled an appointment with my teacher who was giving us lessons through a semester. As I had explained to her my strategies of learning that done before, She gaves me two valuable pieces of advice that were "get to know your weaknesses and focus just on one subject at the time then move to other". Therefore, with her generous idea, I got a better result and had passionate to improve my mistakes one by one.
Secondly, having precise knowldge about a certain subject is boosting our confident which obtains from being patient and also hard working. As I mentioned above, learning multiple things provide a basic knowlege, as compared to being a master in the special subject. When I had tried to improve my grammar mistakes, and comprehend the lesson. Then, taking a quiz which contains a variety of the question about the grammar, In order to the improvement of my skills, I got a high score in contrast of the last exam.
In conclusion, I strongly disagree with having broad knowledge in several subjects. We could not provide precious results.
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-13 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 68
- TPO-24 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job.Use specific reasons and examples 70
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes solid focus and precise thought. Firstly, a focus is the key to learning ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to improve my mistakes one by one. Secondly, having precise knowldge about ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...score in contrast of the last exam. In conclusion, I strongly disagree with ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 313.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90095846645 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78465251373 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594249201278 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.928091344 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.875 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2127691515 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698747143808 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101258998856 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14369325709 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891957034744 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.