Due to convenient transportation, modern people love to go to travel. this raises the question that whether the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. I take the position that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide undoubtedly.
To begin with, you do not have to worried about anything when traveling in a group led by a tour guide. The tour guide would help you to cope with everything you should notice, so yo can enjoy your trip fully. For example, last summer I took a trip with my friends to Iceland. Iceland is the nation that not only is far away but also has poor transportation. It is really difficult to us to prepare the trip and practice our travel plan. Finally, we gave up planning the trip by ourselves, and we travel in a group led by a tour guide. During the trip, we just followed the tour guide and do not be afraid of missing the bus, getting lose, and having communication gap with local people.
Additionally, it is really a good way to make friends when participating in group travel. Having common experiences, we can easily interact with other members in a travel group. Take myself for example. I met my best friend when joining in the travel group to Japan. Because we went to Japan alone, feeling boring, we talked to each other. No sooner had we started to chat, we became friend. Due to the guiding from the tour guide, both of us did not have to pay much attention on the surroundings, and we can share our feeling with each other to our hearts' content.
To sum up, I am of the opinion that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide, because we don't need to spend much time in preparation for the trip and can indulged ourselves with the trip. Besides, traveling in a group is a good chance for us to take friends.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: iPass
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
Due to convenient transportation , modern people love to go to travel. thi...
^^
Line 1, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n , modern people love to go to travel. this raises the question that whether the be...
^^^^
Line 2, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... guide undoubtedly. To begin with, you dont have to worried about anything when tra...
^^^^
Line 2, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... It is really difficult to us to prepare the trip and practice our travel plan. F...
^^
Line 2, column 585, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ip, we just followed the tour guide and dont be afraid of missing the bus, getting l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...guiding from the tour guide, both of us didnt have to pay much attention on the surro...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...a group led by a tour guide, because we dont need to spend much time on preparation ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, if, really, so, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.26331360947 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48214269561 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488165680473 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0674638834 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8421052632 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.31578947368 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253900336783 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0942852802584 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818670193419 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188337903081 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587152183362 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 58.1214874552 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.13 10.9000537634 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.