Technological advances enable the fast spread of news, often in real-time, resulting in the dissemination of inaccurate and false information. In light of this, this essay will explain two reasons of why I agree with the statement that people should get information from different news resources in order to be well-informed.
First, due to technology development, information reaches people around the whole globe at an incredibly fast speed. Information is capable of cross borders and spread easily, and mass media does everything to provide first-hand news, and sometimes it happens in an inaccurately way. Furthermore, people should beware and search information based on trustful and updated websites. My own experience demonstrates that this is true. Last week, when I was going to work, I received a text from a friend of my mine with a picture from an unknown news website saying that the subway was not operating normally. I decided to take the bus and, while I was on my way to work, he sent me another text saying that the resource he sent me before was not updated and the subway was already working. I ended arriving late at work and this would not happen if I had checked the information in a different resource.
Secondly, the big amount of resources leads people to take advantage of the anonymity to spread false information, commonly known as fake news. This harmful practice is increasing and so its damages, so search information from different news sources is fundamental to avoid this misleading news. The most recent and known event related to it was the false information spread by Donald Trump about Hillary Clinton’s campaign to presidency. By the time, apparently inoffensive news about Clinton started to be spread through the internet and false information started to being added to it. As result ended up affecting Hillary's campaign directly, benefiting the current president of the United States, Donald Trump.
In conclusion, these are few of the many reasons why I think people should be concerned to get information from different news resources. Inaccurate and false information has a big power of influence, and in a world with a lot of information like we currently live, it’s our duty to beware of it.
- TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use spec 98
- TOEFL integrated writing: The sea otter 80
- TOEFL T P O 1 Integrated Writing Task 95
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 84
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('inaccurately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...-hand news, and sometimes it happens in an inaccurately way. Furthermore, people should beware and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08908045977 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90271847427 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560344827586 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8711355386 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6875 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209124755867 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759584419699 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998437978365 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169039808646 0.150856017488 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950294273846 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.