Nowadays, getting reliable news seems one of the most challenging things to do as many news media are being so selective about the information that they broadcast. In fact, many people prefer to get their news and information from one resource as they find these resources agree with them on many levels. However, in my viewpoint, I believe people must get their news from different resources since they would be able to make unbiased judgments and think of the box.
Initially, every news channel, website, or magazine has its own agenda. As a result, when a person has the ability to obtain his information from more than one resource, he would be able to make an impartial judgment that is not similar to one resource or another. For example, during the Egyptian revolution in 2011, my friend and I used to follow the news day by day. On one hand, he liked to get his information from the governmental TV in Egypt, which was in favor of the former regimen. On the other hand, I was watching many Youtube channels that had different viewpoints about the political situation. Therefore, I was able to build my story about the event in a more authentic way, which helped me to anticipate the result of that period. He, however, could not believe what happened by the end of the revolution as he was expecting the winning of the military. Seeing that, I have learned that people build their perspectives and beliefs from what they watch or hear; thus, they must be careful in terms of choosing their resources.
More importantly, having many resources gives a person the ability to think about his or her surroundings in a way that is different and unique. In my community, for instance, most people have the same opinion about different topics because they all watch the same governmental news channel. One of my friends, anyway, likes to watch international channels. Therefore, his way of thinking is unique and more solid than others. Doing that, he became one of the best political satires in the region.
All in all, in order to build your perspective in a healthy way, you must get your information from different resources as it would be more impartial and authentic.
- TPO-25 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 75
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-15 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 77
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...all, in order to build your perspective in a healthy way, you must get your information from dif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79840848806 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66249847205 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490716180371 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5937047774 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.411764706 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41176470588 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217822476277 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707576078893 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634746023472 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15756369697 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682686824211 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.