TPO-22 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

I definitely agree that teachers are not supposed to make their social or political views known to students in the classroom and reasons are discussed as following.

First of all, teachers' influence on students is immense, so if they talk a lot about their social o r political views in the classroom, the students would be deeply affected by this. A good example of teacher's influence on students would be Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. All of the three were great philosophers in ancient Greece, and Socrates was Plato's teacher, who subsequently educated Aristotle. Although they have their own understandings of philosophy and of the world, their points of view are in accordance with each other in essence, clearly due to the relationship between the three. Plato even tried to protect his teacher, Socrate's philosophical views after he was executed.

Then one might ask why teachers are not expected to pass their social or political view to their students. Unlike mathematics and sciences, social and political views varies with people and with time, which only represent the views of a single person at a given time. So one's attitude towards society and politics would be narrow, shallow and even extreme if they receive a certain point of view from a teacher at a young age, which could hinder their further development.

What is more, the real mission of education is to make people capable of viewing the world in a right way, and the real mission of teachers is to cultivate independent thinkers other than their own followers. While mathematical formulas and scientific facts are settled, social and political views are dynamic and diversified. So it is necessary for students to learn maths and sciences from theaters, but when it comes to social and political views, another approach is desired. Instead of telling students their own point of views, teachers should tell students ways of thinking and observing, and should teach them different social and political views as many as possible. Only in this way can the students be intelligent and independent enough to form their own social and political views.

In conclusion, teachers' role in modern society is to cultivate a person that is knowledgeable, independent and free-thinking, thus directing telling them teachers' own social and political views in the classroom is not expected. On the contrary, teachers should teach students how to understand the world and form their own attitudes toward the world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...would be Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. All of the three were great philosophers in ancien...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ake people capable of viewing the world in a right way, and the real mission of teachers is to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, first of all, on the contrary, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2084.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15841584158 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80483009391 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.1262680973 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327509636939 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128096814087 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771690798879 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226626894139 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744268861159 0.0645574589148 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.