TPO-22 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Submitted by M.S 2019 on Tue, 10/15/2019 - 06:05

There is no gainsaying that teachers have a vital role in students' lives. There is a great debate whether teachers should declare their political and social views in the class room or not. From my perspective, teachers should not talk about their political and social views in the classroom, since they not only might misuse their teaching opportunity, but also might distract from their main duty. In addition, the teachers should not spend the time of class for anything except teaching. The ensuing paragraphs will elaborate my points of view.

First exquisite point is mentioned is that, teachers have a far-reaching impact on the students. The great majority of students listen carefully to teacher words and they trust to their teachers. Therefore, if the teacher would be allowed to assert their social and political views, they have a great opportunity for misusing. For example, in my country, people who are older than 16 years are capable to vote; when I was in high school, our mathematics teacher were advocate one candidate and his words influenced on our decision and we voted to his favorite candidate. After some few years, I regret for my vote.

Second point that comes to my mind is that the teachers and students should just concentrate on the education a sole aim, not anything else. When a teacher talks about her political and social views, she is likely to have less concentration on the course materials and she cannot teach efficiently. Furthermore, when teachers declare their views and sometime some students might debate with them. These controversial arguments can hurt the teachers and students relationships and decrease the teachers and students concentration and efficiency. Hence, teacher should not be allowed to assert their views in classrooms.

Last but not least, time is precious and everybody especially teachers should appreciate time and do not waste it. Teachers have limited time for teaching during each semester and most of them cannot teach all materials on time and they coerce students to participate in the extra sessions. And most of these sessions are hold in the last weeks of the semester and they have adverse impact on the students’ efficiency. Since, most of the students are busy and they are not interested to participate in extra sessions. Therefore, although the teachers' view can help the students especially some real life aspects, the teachers should just teach the course material and do not squander the class time for talking about their political and social views.

In conclusion, contemplating the aforementioned paragraphs, the teacher should just concentrate on the teaching rather than anything else.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...in high school, our mathematics teacher were advocate one candidate and his words in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 468, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'advocated'.
Suggestion: advocated
...gh school, our mathematics teacher were advocate one candidate and his words influenced ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, talking about

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 13.8261648746 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2261.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 433.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22170900693 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75645335254 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459584295612 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6918909715 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220046613143 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814055537152 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544563263137 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137587233787 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658449693039 0.0645574589148 102% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.