TPO 24- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Work is very important part of our lives. It is vital because it is our source of income and the profit we make out of our job goes to utilities, food, gas bills, health and for leisure purposes. Some people believe that it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. In my humble opinion, I choose the latter option. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, working in today's generation is very hectic, everything is under strict deadline and the output of your job needs to be perfect. Bosses are very perfectionist with the information and details in each projects they have because they need to satisfy the clients to sign a business deal. It is better to take your time slowly but surely because time is more allocated wisely if this method will be applied. Hence, the job will be precise and accurate due to you are taking your time to make sure everything runs smoothly. In addition, people will not waste their time rechecking the information that is written because it is well though of, so the data are concise and factual. Every aspect in the project is well researched and planned so that fewer mistakes will be committed. For instance, scientist work slowly taking their time to get all the necessary details for their experiment in order for them to correctly answer their hypothesis. They carefully considering all the possible aspects in their experiment and eliminate every possible mistakes they will encounter in their trial phase, so that their end result will be flawless.
Secondly, the negative consequence of working quickly is making errors. Working under extreme time frame makes employees nervous and panicky and as a result they tend to commit many mistakes. Many resources are wasted because of doing the job in a hurry, the finish product of their labor will suffer because its quality will be mediocre. The quality is deeply affected because workmanship is not given its 100% effort. Also, company money and energy are being wasted due to the job will be repeated due to many defects in the product. Additional manpower is needed to recheck again the production just to make sure that the work is done correctly, so that their items will be approved for sales. To sum up, it is detrimental in the part of the company because they are losing profits with such actions of employees who are working in a hurry just to finish the work.
To summarize, I believe that it is beneficial to work in a slow phase but the output will be perfect. This is because resources and time will be used properly and working conditions will be maximized, hence committing less error in work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- TPO 31 A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some paleontologists interpret 70
- TPO 33- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of |locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 68
- TPO 15- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 47 Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs w 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, as a result, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 15.1003584229 258% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2264.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75630252101 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4698092295 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478991596639 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4473181483 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.909090909 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.45110844103 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216974555949 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804264490698 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101730530214 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152933734259 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727212910303 0.0645574589148 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.