In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Nowadays, according to the drastically growth in the population in the world, with the consequence that demands level of this people for food, energy, land and such things have increased, supply of this demands needs to the steady and serious effort in the most of jobs. Although, both of high accurate and spending less time for doing works is very important, some people prefer to do their responsibilities only in less time even without enough accurately, but others prefer do their works in high accurate even if take far more time. When it comes to me, I certainly, would follow those value much more to the latter compared to the former. Some of my outstanding reasons for this choice are elaborated in detail in the following:
As my most persuasive reason, lack of enough accuracy in some works may causes to the suffering the health of people, even could result in death of some people. As an example, if someone whose job is airplane mechanic and check the motor of airplanes does not his work with adequate accurate only because of the saving time, lives of tens of people would be exposed to the any damage, especially death due to the falling of airplane. So, for prevention of such risks, persons in such jobs are responsible to do their work with unlimited accurate.
Second, a production with inadequate accuracy probably would be destroyed earlier than one which is produced in more time but with more accuracy, so financially in sometimes it is much better to spend more time for produce things. For example, a house which is built in at least time accuracy as well as at least time, would be destroyed earlier than a building which design and constructed in enough accuracy. regarding to the maintenance and repair costs as an additional cost in a project, which is incorrectly built, would be a reasonable reason to the do works in maximum accuracy.
as another reason, although doing works in high speed would decrease the needed time, after a while needed time to repair might be even far more than the saved time at the first. As a sensible example, someone who thinks if his or her speed be higher than the speed limit he or she is able to save time and does not attention to the limit speed, therefore, unfortunately, an accident might take a lot of time of her or his. So, sometimes doing works with insufficient accuracy just due to the spending less time is potential to get more and more time of individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- cedar trees 73
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 26 76
- In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...h the consequence that demands level of this people for food, energy, land and such ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d such things have increased, supply of this demands needs to the steady and serious...
^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the jobs') or simply say ''most jobs''.
Suggestion: most of the jobs; most jobs
...to the steady and serious effort in the most of jobs. Although, both of high accurate and sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their work with unlimited accurate. Second, a production with inadequate acc...
^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Regarding
...ign and constructed in enough accuracy. regarding to the maintenance and repair costs as ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... built, would be a reasonable reason to the do works in maximum accuracy. as another...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
... to the do works in maximum accuracy. as another reason, although doing works in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, at least, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2022.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72429906542 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60107389789 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483644859813 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.1344086022 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7307888212 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.5 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6666666667 20.6045352989 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112633757586 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507752384974 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276835044931 0.0737576698707 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771285746104 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0067087887169 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 11.7677419355 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.0537634409 159% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.247311828 156% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.