TPO 29
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
I am of the opinion that income of the instructors should be increased specially in developing country such as Mongolia. I feel this way for three main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, some professors put effort to matter which is not related to their main job because salary they receive from the organization is not capable of satisfying their need. Therefore, they are not able to pay more attention to students with whom professors are working, which makes hard for students to get further advice from them. If their salary improves, they will be able to spend their time for the graduates. My personal experience is compelling example of this. Instructors of the university where I study receives different scale of salary depending on their degree or curriculum. In other words, some teachers have income which is below than par. Thereby, I have problems to get advice from certain teachers who are doing additional things while professors who do not expend time on extra things are available to meet with me and counsel me for the subject. Fortunately, If pedagogues whose income is not enough receives more salary, they will be able to recommend their students. Universities can solve the problem which posing difficulties to pupils and lecturers by spending more money on their salary.
Secondly, most young people in my country tend to consider profession of teacher is not suitable to them because average salary is lower compared to other jobs. If universities start devoting more fund for teachers' salary, they can change mind of adolescents. Moreover, quality of teachers will increase rapidly because of competition among new generation, which will better the education of country as whole. For example, I wanted to become mathematics professor because mathematics and teaching are enjoyable thing. Unfortunately, this idea was changed as soon as study about salary of professor in my nation. If educational institutions start financing the salary, young people who want to become lecturer may follow their dream because general circumstance related to the income and their wish will coincide.
To sum up, In my opinion, universities can improve the situation as whole by devoting more money for their workers. This is because more people would want to get teacher and prevailing teachers can fuss over on their job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-24 | Kinga Wangmo | 77 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | AliKopol | 70 | view |
- TPO 21 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 33 80
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i feel, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16062176166 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74830296958 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525906735751 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.143075127 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.842105263 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224411608293 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709195553625 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513711210792 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13066172058 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403162466389 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.