Knowledge is priceless says the adage, but I think the person creating the knowledge does have a price. Many people see doing science as a noble profession that rewards its scientist with the gratification of discovering something new, but like any other person, they should be financially and properly retributed. Accordingly, I think that Universities should spend more money on their professors' salaries, for the following reasons.
First, the more you pay, the better the professors are going to be. Competent people have a lot of opportunities, naturally, they will go to the one that pays them the best and that is not usually university. For example, in England, there is a shortage of computer science professors because industry have them on high demand and the pay is much greater than that of a university. Consequently, I think that if universities want the best personnel, they have to raise the salary.
Moreover, professors should be rewarded properly. They play a crucial role in the world, they develop new technologies and discover breakthroughs that all the world benefits from. However, they do not get paid as much as they should for this immense task and many professors go into side projects to gain extra income. On the other hand, if their salaries were higher, they could focus solely on their research, and it will result on better and more impactful results.
Nonetheless, many people may argue that the universities should invest their money in research so that the institution is always at the forefront of knowledge. But as I said, investing in the human capital is a much better choice because research does not need to be more expensive in order to be better, but a better scientist could get better results with fewer funds.
To summarize, universities should invest more in their professor in order to attract better professionals, that could focus solely on their work instead of having to worry about financial security. In the end, I think we should pay handsomely the person who creates the priceless knowledge.
- TPO-14 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-09 - Integrated Writing Task Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile's main source of power, the internal-combustion engine. By far the most promising alternative source of energy for cars is the hy 80
- 41)Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 76
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 88
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07352941176 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84959020911 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520588235294 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4831432078 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108607196672 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434196749341 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460452289935 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670256237132 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304735814049 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.