Certainly, I agree that universities should pay more money to the professors to enhance the quality of education. Someone can consciously weigh the pros and cons of each side. The explanations go as follows.
First of all, it can improve professors’ performance and efficiency. Nowadays, the world changes very quickly and people now can see tremendous enhancements in different field of science and engineering including electronic, computer, chemistry, as well as mechanic. It should be very essential for every professor to be up to date with these modern technologies. Paying more money to the university instructors gives them opportunity to register and attend to the different educational groups or conferences and move with new advancements and inventions. For instance, a professor can enroll in an artificial intelligence workshop to be master the materials about digital equipments such as a camera, satellite, television, or smart phone. Moreover, professors can use this money to order several educational books and movies to reach to a profound understanding about the material that they need to cover in the course.
Furthermore, motivating professors to teach well is another noticeable support. Almost all professors suffer lots of stress and anxiety from students and academic environments. They ought to either speak or stand up for long hours in the classrooms. This money can be aimed as a motivation to whet professor appetite to concentrate on their teaching tasks and as a result teach well. Besides, the professors can use this money to go to the beach and enjoy from different amusements such as swimming, scuba diving, or walking on the sand stones, and as a consequence either relieve stress or keep away the pressure and prepare themselves for teaching.
Admittedly, there are some justifications by some persons that oppose to pay more money to the university professors. Mainly, this money can be used to purchase either new tables for the libraries or useful tools for the labs in order to improve education quality. However, still I affirm that the universities should pay more money to the professors. For instance, these days, the governments pass rules to maintain extra resources or funds for all universities to buy those mentioned stuffs.
Due to aforementioned ground, I think that all people should bear in mind that it is necessary to give university professors more money to raise education quality. Participating of keeping up with new knowledge and invoking professors’ sense to do their job well are two prime and conspicuous factors that contribute the quality of education.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 75
- TPO-33 - Integrated Writing Task Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types o 70
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 87
- TPO-27 - Integrated Writing Task The little ice age was a period of unusually cold temperature in many parts of the world that lasted from about the year 1350 until 1900CE. There were unusually harsh winters, and glaciers grew larger in many areas. Scient 80
Essay evaluation report
to be master the materials about digital equipments
to master the materials about digital equipment
by some persons that oppose to pay more money
by some persons who oppose to pay more money
flaws:
The second and third paragraph are somehow duplicated.
and need more subClauses starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 417 350
No. of Characters: 2157 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.519 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.173 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.987 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 152 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 120 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.85 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.226 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.55 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.304 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.513 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.051 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 929, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that they need to cover in the course. Furthermore, motivating professors to te...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re and prepare themselves for teaching. Admittedly, there are some justification...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'well', 'for instance', 'i think', 'such as', 'as a result', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277419354839 0.229887763892 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.139784946237 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0688172043011 0.0866891130778 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0408602150538 0.046263068375 88% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258064516129 0.0685040099705 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0924731182796 0.118717715034 78% => OK
Participles: 0.0236559139785 0.0351676179071 67% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.16073332472 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0623655913978 0.0309702414327 201% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00645161290323 0.00188951952338 341% => OK
Determiners: 0.094623655914 0.0887237588012 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0279569892473 0.0209618222197 133% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00430107526882 0.0139019557991 31% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2646.0 2387.08602151 111% => OK
No of words: 417.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.34532374101 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36690647482 0.338922669872 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304556354916 0.251872472559 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.242206235012 0.174417080927 139% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.199040767386 0.112833075102 176% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16073332472 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539568345324 0.524397521467 103% => OK
Word variations: 61.9610596496 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.85 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0521691086 48.84282405 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.3 120.699889404 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.644075263715 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.3056354916 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.90625 1.45489161554 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419721127527 0.300154397459 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0777431404181 0.103427244359 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0558376278887 0.0752933317313 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.534297769654 0.497263757937 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145066337774 0.151897553556 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169962841789 0.114077575197 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830404072575 0.0781384742642 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.406733482728 0.336927656856 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0734771698004 0.067059652881 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30233078063 0.210909579961 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218253795368 0.0618886996521 35% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.6433691756 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.