TPO 35 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

TPO 35- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays, cars play a significant role in our lives and many people are dependent on them. Although humans are highly affiliate with cars, prominent issues such as global warming, and green environment have been so important that they can reduce this dependence. They have attracted people’s attention in a way that changed people’s attitudes and perspectives to reduce some disadvantages effects of using more car in our world. On the other hand, using a private car has a lot of costs that have made people intended to public transportation. In the following, I will elaborate more on this issue.
Firs, today, people have been informed about negative consequences of producing lots of cars and their movements around the world. In recent years, air pollution, and traffic jam are of the most substantial issues that people deal with. In this regard, reducing the number of cars, which commute in street and road, can be considered as a specific solution. For example, the Environment Agency said: ‘’reducing car traffic and using public transportation such as the subway could make a huge difference in the environment over the next few years’’. As global efforts have been made in this area, we will expect to see a significant reduction in the number of cars in the coming years.
Second, according to high price of parking lots, increasing in cost of gasoline, and wasting time in commuting it completely reasonable to use public transportation instead of personal cars. For example, when I want to reach a certain destination with my car, I should consider traffic and spend a lot of time for my commute. However, using public transportation guarantees that I will reach my destination on time. Due to all these conditions, the number of cars will have decreased at the end of the next twenty years and public transportation will be further expanded.
In conclusion, regarding the points mentioned above, it seems that, people’s awareness in one side and specific advantages of public transportation from other side would lead to decreasing in number of cars. The role of governments has been very colorful in terms of improving public transportation, as well as global organizations in public information.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-06-23 YasamanEsml 76 view
2023-04-13 sonyeoso 76 view
2023-01-11 theprasad 73 view
2023-01-04 Mangiring Pandapotan 83 view
2022-11-05 daddy 70 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user setaresepid :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'affiliated'.
Suggestion: affiliated
...ent on them. Although humans are highly affiliate with cars, prominent issues such as glo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I will elaborate more on this issue. Firs, today, people have been informed a...
^^
Line 4, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al organizations in public information.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15702479339 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06266714304 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5232897751 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160000056772 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563344801399 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351820497455 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.096140715547 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515659705662 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.