TPO 37- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
Nowadays people usually lead more hectic life than the folks did in the past. This issue has its own problems and effects of humans' activities. Intrinsically, people are oriented to do their best; hence one of the pragmatic methods to meet this objective is doing very few things well. I subscribe to this perspective since people can focus and pay more attention to what they do; what is more, in this way, they lose their work reputation. In what follows, an in-depth discussion on each of the abovementioned reasons is presented.
The first and possibly the paramount consequential reason why I believe that thereby being busy, people do very few things well is that by doing few tasks human will be able to spend more time and effort doing what they planned before. Doing multifarious undertakings and, on the other hand, wanting to be committed to all of them distract us from our action and take much effort and energy. In such a harsh milieu, we cannot chase our prioritized plan and we might do some frantic activities. Having well-organized mind and a solid plan significantly help us do our best.
Another point springing to mind, which deserves some words here in corroborating my notion is that preserving our reputation of doing undertakings well is indispensable. That is to say that, for example, employers or whoever we are committed to size up our efficacy and see how much we can solve the concurrent problems. In fact, undertaking chores more than our ability will destroy our reputation in a job. Doing less work well is highly worthwhile than fulfilling tasks incomplete or wrong.
To sum it all up, by taking all the aforementioned grounds into consideration, we may logically draw a conclusion that not only preserving reputation but also an intrinsic tendency to do our activity well leads us to do a few things upon being busy in our life. Notwithstanding insightful attempts to detect some general reasons, intelligibly, this subject matter is a complex issue that requires field research with a broad spectrum of people’s Intelligence Quotients (IQs), which might reveal the ability of humans to do their tasks in harsh conditions more precisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 70 | view |
| 2018-08-27 | zabanfinish | 75 | view |
| 2018-08-27 | zabanfinish | 76 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | ricardommaark | 76 | view |
- TPO 31- Integrated 80
- TPO 31: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
- TPO 34: Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phones, online games, and social networking Web site. 76
- TPO 37- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 90
- TPO 31: Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, so, well, while, for example, in fact, what is more, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99450549451 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97042439466 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8066539783 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.2 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289065516061 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098928560985 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994627325541 0.0737576698707 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184842760133 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653921699377 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.