TPO 37 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People hold different attitudes towards whether one person should do various things at the same time to optimize his schedule or focus his time and energy on few things to get them done with flying colors. In my opinion, I give my vote to the latter argument. There are two reasons for my view which I will explore in the following essay.
On the one hand, people want to do multitasking to make use of their schedule. For example, a student can do one or some part-time jobs during his terms to make ends meet. On the other hand, the amount of hours in a day is limited to 24 hours, part of which is consumed to do basic personal needs. As such, there are a few hours left for professional activities. Should a man carry out many distinct tasks during the day, time frame for each activity is inadaquate. As the result, he is unable to do things adequately especially intricate ones which requires extensive time and efforts. My own experience is a compelling example. When I was a freshman student, I took a dual program hoping to get two bachelor degrees on both chemistry and physics. However, my grades were moderate because I had to take part into too many classes in a semester which meant that I had little time to study each subject thoroughly. After one year, I made my decision to dedicate time to only chemistry major and then I got much better outcome.
Secondly, there are always some tasks which are more vital or difficult than the others. Therefore, it is necessary that we allocate extensive resources including time and mind to finish them successfully. If we, on the other hand, carry out different things together with these important ones, we are unable to gain comprehensive understanding or knowledge of those matters. An exemplary example is becoming a pilot. Maneuvering an airplane especially a passenger carrying one is so complicated that one pilot is required to spend most of his time learning the principles of a single type of aircraft. As the result, few pilots can control both Airbus A320 and Boeing 737 aircraft despite the fact that those 2 models are pretty similar.
In conclusion, those abovementioned reasons put weight to my view that when people do a range of different things, they cannot do all of them well. There is an old saying that best describes this circumstance which is a rolling stone gathers no moss.
- Intelligent machines like robots will be widely implemented as a replacement for human beings Broach its pros and cons 61
- TPO 38 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 23 - Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses to explain this decline. 68
- TPO 23 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 76
- TPO 42 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67697479945 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574879227053 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1989934321 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0952380952 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190025146237 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509641380182 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654476301516 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129377223932 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559997426357 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.