TPO 38, independent-
agree or not?
leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Top leadership has always been considered as the most critical success factor in project-based organizations without which the success rate of a firm's projects will fall drastically even more than 20%. In this context, there are mutually exclusive ideas regarding whether some people are born leaders or individuals can learn how to become effective ones. From my point of view, I am inclined to the latter notion in spite of the fact that the former has more aficionados among organizational managers. My answer to this debating bone of contention is twofold. In the following, the rationale behind it will be elaborated by the most outstanding, solid proofs.
The first and foremost reason which is worth mentioning is that scholars have solved this issue long ago as this problem is literally crystal clear in academic articles. Technically, there are six leadership schools first of which is "Charismatic Leadership" which was introduced in early 19's century. In that time, most of leadership practitioners believed that leaders, such as Hitler, Gandi, and Nelson Mandella, were born leaders. They knew how to make people obey their orders intrinsically. However, fifty years later, Ralf Muller, the most renowned professor in this concept, introduced the latest leadership school, known as "leadership competency school". In his famous article, published in "The Leadership Quarterly", he insisted that leadership consists of various skills which can be learned. Therefore, it is now globally deemed that all individuals can be effective leaders providing that they try their best to learn its principles.
The second and eqaully far-reaching explanation to bear in mind is that new innovative working conditions have been generated which really require new leadership techniques. This definitely proves that leadership is a teachable skill rather than a natural gift. To put it into a more vivid picture, researchers of RMIT university, a well-known knowledge institute in Australia, announced that IT companies will have entered their new "agile" era by the end of 2025. Having a completely new, albeit unfamiliar, hierarchy and working methodologies will need new leadership practices. Answering to this demand, PMI (Project Management Institute), located in the United States, published a new body of knowledge last year which aims to teach necessary skills of future leaders confronting the sophisticated technological world. Some of the new skills are: deep knowledge of programming, especially machine learning techniques; the ability to adhere to E-meeting agendas; and, the ability to lead multi-international team members in diverse locations. As leadership-related skills are being updated almost every year, no one can have this ability naturally.
In conclusion, taking all the aforementioned rationalizations into account, I uphold that leadership can be achieved by everyone through learning although there are some exceptions which can be excluded from the general rule. To recapitulate my opinions, not only the concept of leadership underwent a drastic change at the beginning of the twentieth century as university professors disproved "Charismatic Leadership" concept, but also leadership skills are always being updated in order to become adjusted to the ever-changing environments of various industries, especially Information & Technology (IT) industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | Pooja dave | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-11 | Pooja dave | 81 | view |
- life on venus can be possible in a floating station above its surface 73
- TPO 38 independent agree or not leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader 76
- TPO 36 independent agree or not for the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities 80
- TPO 38 integrated using international fund to protect forests from being deforested is useful 80
- powered flight by ptesaurs 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...ing explanation to bear in mind is that new innovative working conditions have been generated ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... the sophisticated technological world. Some of the new skills are: deep knowledge of progr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2928.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76377952756 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41629789104 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 906.3 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9447963234 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.428571429 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1904761905 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170571081319 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052475241237 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042303174992 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108371518053 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277342026494 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 10.9000537634 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 86.8835125448 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...ing explanation to bear in mind is that new innovative working conditions have been generated ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 833, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... the sophisticated technological world. Some of the new skills are: deep knowledge of progr...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2928.0 1977.66487455 148% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76377952756 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41629789104 2.67179642975 128% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 212.727598566 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594488188976 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 906.3 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9447963234 48.9658058833 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.428571429 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1904761905 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170571081319 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052475241237 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042303174992 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108371518053 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277342026494 0.0645574589148 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 10.9000537634 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.01818996416 126% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 86.8835125448 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.