No one can deny the fact that nothing comes naturally. On that ground, people can learn anything according to their interest in the world as time passes gradually. In this regard, some sociologists believe that leadership is an innate behavior and cannot be learned. On the other hand, there is a group of people who consider it as an exaggeration, and apparently, hold the opposite view. From my vantage point, the latter view contains more weight. I take the position on account for the following reasons.
The first reason that makes me hold the belief that infants start the learning process as soon as they are born. Commonly, young children are always trying to imitate other’s personalities and their behaviors. In this whole process, children unconsciously grasp many new abilities which would make them a better human being. Apart from that, schools also play an important role because taking part in the school’s different activities would enhance children’s hidden skills which can be nurtured and well-nourished as they grow older. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in elementary school, I was introverted who used to afraid to talk in a crowd. Later on, when I started high school, I started involving myself in different group activities and projects whereby I learned to raise my strong viewpoint while working with different people. Thus, after a few years, I was appointed as a school leader which made me believe that human being can learn anything if have a strong mindset to achieve their goals.
Another equally noteworthy point is that social connection plays an inevitable role in personal development. To shed more light on it, taking part in social activities and interacting with different types of people would help to serve valuable experiences. Accordingly, it will enlarge their range of communication skills which play a crucial role in building the capabilities of becoming a good leader. For instance, a recent survey conducted at Chicago university shows that social connectivity and taking part in social events would push youngsters to evolve with different personalities such as leadership. Therefore, a consistent approach can make it possible to enrich different skills.
All in all, contemplating all remarks, I strongly believe that leadership can be learned after birth. This is because participating in various actions can help people to develop skills and one of them is leadership.
- During our careers we work with many different kinds of people All of them have unique characteristics and personality traits In your opinion which of the following is the most important characteristic of a coworker a serious attitude regarding their work 73
- Do you agree or disagree Internet should be like other services such as roads and government should provide it to the public with no cost 70
- Getting advice from friends of an older age would be more valuable than from friends your own age 80
- Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting advice from friends your same age
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country Use specific reasons to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21158690176 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89333938556 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581863979849 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3901428266 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5238095238 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131217916996 0.236089414692 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366467319677 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457431928743 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0899989386694 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452970930545 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.