It is significantly imperative to have a job and career that can provide us enough food to eat and pay the bills as well as be successful. While some people believe that it is easier now than before to find jobs and careers, which can lead to a successful future for people, others do not agree with this notion and they think that it was a lot easier for people in the past to identify types of jobs to be more successful. I am of the opinion of the latter and I will elaborate on why I feel this way in the following paragraphs.
First of all, in the past societies were less developed than now, so the jobs were limited and distinct. People had clear understanding of the available careers and professions of the sociey and it was easier to choose from these limited options. Additionally, there were less complex and big manufatures in the past, so the jobs were less diverse. For instance, my father lived in the rural areas when he was younger and he always said that the people of the area had distinct professions and limited options to choose from. Most of the professions had low incomes and people thought that by being teacher or doctors they can have successful jobs and secure their future.
Second of all, technologies and advancements that nowadays we have is growing fast and creates more jobs and options to people. In these days, we have a lot of choices that we can select from, but this makes it hard to idenfity which job is good for us or will lead to a successful future for us. In the past without these technologies it was easier to choose and distinguish jobs. Moreover, we do not have clear understanding of the different professions that is available now, since the profession are so complex and complicated to choose. Hence, it is not easy to select professions in these days.
To put it all in a nutshell, I strongly believe that it was easier to identify careers in the past because not only jobs were limited and sicieties were less developed, but also there were less technologies and issues related to that.
- Some people prefer to ask for advice before making an important decision Others feel that it is best to make these decisions alone Which do you prefer Give reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 80
- Nowadays many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to 71
- Spartacus the rebel leader who fought against the Romans with an army of fellow escaped slaves is one of the most famous figures in ancient Roman history Spartacus led his men against their Roman oppressors and managed to defeat the Roman army in several 73
- In 1912 a bookseller named Wilfrid M Voynich acquired a beautifully illustrated handwritten book manuscript written on vellum vellum is a material that was used for writing before the introduction of paper The Voynich manuscript as it became known resembl 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun technologies is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ere less developed, but also there were less technologies and issues related to that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, well, while, for instance, i feel, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55013550136 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63289140035 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457994579946 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1619610923 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176544468731 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615114391315 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537428150636 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117164988005 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461081641249 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.