Nowadays we are so much dependent on cars and other modes of transport. Since our frequency of travel for different purpose increase, we can not think of our life without cars. In my opinion, there will be more cars in use in the future. Therefore, I disagree with the statement. I feel this way for a few reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, a decreased price will make everyone enable to effort a car. Because of technological advancement, various car manufacturing companies will be able to reduce their prices. This reduction in price will help lots of people to buy a car. My father is the best example of this logic. About ten years ago, when I was in class 8, we were not so much solvent. It was very difficult for my father to effort a car due to its high price. We used public transport for our mobility. But about three years ago, when lots of companies were offering cars at a lower price, my father brought a car. If the prices of cars were not lessened, my father would not be able to buy a car. Therefore, I believe, the car price will be much lower than today it is, thus will lead most people to buy cars.
Second, people's attraction to luxurious goods to show their social status. Nowadays, people are so much attracted to luxurious goods like cars. They believe, these goods reflect their social status. To show off their social status, they try hard and soul to increase their luxurious goods. For example, about five years ago, when I was at college, I had a friend named Akash. His family was rich and they had one car. At that time only a few people own cars. But when many people started to purchase cars, Akash's father brought another two cars, one for his son and another for his mother. He did this because he wanted to show the difference between himself and other people's social status that is they are richer than others. Therefore, this tendency of people will increase the number of cars in the long run.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the use of cars will be increased in the future rather than decrease. Because the price of the car is decreasing day by day and attraction to luxurious goods like cars, which reflect the social status, is increasing gradually.
- integrated writing TPO 7 47
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5459057072 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39445737135 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473945409429 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5350548511 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8518518519 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9259259259 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.48148148148 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164754205246 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056923470474 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575043020504 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116268062193 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513662246405 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.