Teachers play an important role in the growth of a child. They should have more knowledge, patience, and passion to teach a subject. In my opinion, teachers nowadays are less valued than in the past because of a lack of knowledge on the subject and more teachers are available at present to teach and increase in the technology like the internet.
First, more teachers are available for one job. For instance, my friend is not good at the subjects, but she got a job in a school because of her uncle's reference. As a result, she was unable to teach well in a class. In that way also there teachers appreciation was decreasing at present. Furthermore, as the technology has grown most of the students are using internet resources to study instead of learning from teachers.
Second, the teachers are more valued in the past because they use to have a lot of knowledge. In the past, there are very few educated persons. For instance, my grandfather told me that in order to pursue higher studies they should get top ranks, as the universities are limited. Hence, there is a lot of competition to get a admission in the university. The university used to provide admission only to the highly talented persons. But at present, there are more schools, colleges, and universities which decreased the competition. As a result, nowadays teachers are lacking the skills required to teach in a class which decreased the appreciation.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers are less appreciated nowadays than in the past because of internet resources and lack of skills.
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 85
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use spe 60
- TPO-16 - Integrated Writing Task The United Kingdom (sometimes referred to as Britain) has a long and rich history of human settlement. Traces of buildings, tools, and art can be found from periods going back many thousands of years: from the Stone Age, t 81
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...re more valued in the past because they use to have a lot of knowledge. In the past...
^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e, there is a lot of competition to get a admission in the university. The univer...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 268.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89179104478 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85516526689 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 212.727598566 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 618.680645161 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.052974273 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9375 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141910245184 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498157572893 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501684135077 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990116084048 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321149985859 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.