A glance at worker's attitudes toward their tasks at work brings to light a question that has several times provoked discussions, that is, whether having various types of tasks to do makes them more satisfied than doing similar tasks. Some might contend that focusing on a single task boosts workers' efficiencies, thus making them more satisfied by accomplishing more. However, I would like to suggest that workers would be happier if they are given more tasks in terms of facing challenges and learning new skills.
First and foremost, handling different tasks requires different skills, thus providing workers with opportunities to learn new things. For example, workers might find that they need to utilize a new set of softwares in the office or new machines and tools in factories to finish a new task, the process of which brings about novel knowledge and make them more capable and experienced as a worker. By picking up new skills, the workers would absolutely feel more content than simply repeating the same things every day.
Secondly, having different sorts of tasks to do diversifies people's work. It is widely accepted that working on a single task for a long time, like several years, make people tired of them, thus lowering their evaluations for the work they are doing. Offered with various tasks, on the contrary, workers would face new challenges and deal with new problems. If they solve those problems successfully, they can harvest a sense of achievement and satisfactory.
Last but not least, as the workers are capable of handling different tasks, it is highly likely that they will get recognition from the employees. A worker would be appreciated if he or she can improve the efficiency of the company and lower the cost for the company to operate by being eligible for doing many kinds of tasks, for the company can now hire fewer employers. The recognition from employees can lead to pay rise or promotion for current workers, making them more satiated in their work.
Due to the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that doing various tasks during the workday makes people more satisfied than doing similar tasks, and the chances to face challenges and learn new skills are two prime and conspicuous reasons.
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 66
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 94
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 83
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04021447721 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61107012208 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530831099196 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9701407649 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.285714286 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.6045352989 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298447402931 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117520344718 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071144904178 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187161060195 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734190704641 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.