One of the most significant feature of each student is that he/she has to know when the right time for speaking is. When it comes to the issue of correcting a mistake of the lecturer, some students believe that they have to talk about that immediately, some others think they have to inform the educator after the session, still others suppose that they have to be quiet since the teacher will find it on his/her own. As far as I am concerned, I believe the second idea carries more weight. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, cut off lecturers because of his/her mistakes can lead to a tense atmosphere. The imagination of a class in which everyone wants to correct the teacher's mistakes makes everybody crazy since it is likely that all the students want to talk simultaneously. As a result, the teacher will be mad at them and it gives rise to undesired circumstances. Take one of my university classes, for illustration. At one time, our professor had some personal problems, so he had a number of mistakes in the class. All of a sudden, all the students wanted to inform him about one of his mistakes which was so obvious. That result in chaotic atmosphere and made our teacher angry, so he did not let us speak anymore.
The other reason which deserves some words here is that the teacher will repeat his/her mistake, if we say nothing about that. Nowadays, teachers have to work too hard to make ends meet, so they may not pay attention to their lecture. In addition, they do not have enough time to revise them. Therefore, it is possible that those mistakes will be repeated in the next semesters. However, when the teachers are informed about their mistakes after the classes, they can correct them.
Another subtle point which I should explain lies in the fact that talking about others' mistakes in front of the population by interrupting them is kind of rudeness and unethical. As our old wise people said "It is polite not to interrupt others." Consequently, waiting until the end of the meeting to tell him/her about what mistakes he/she made during the meeting is the best method to correct his/her mistakes.
To sum up, given the facts that talking during the class to put the lecturer's mistakes right can cause to tense situations, also it is not polite to behave in that manner. In addition, being quiet may lead to similar mistake in next classes, I am of the opinion that lecturers should be informed about their mistakes after the class/meeting.
- TPO 56 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students do reading by their own personality is as important as or more important than reading assigned by teachers 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Companies should pay for employees to get a university degree 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It s better complete a project and then start another one than to do several things at the same time 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tensing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: tensing
... the lecturers mistakes right can cause to tense situations, also it is not polite to be...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, as to, i mean, in addition, kind of, talking about, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 43.0788530466 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72335600907 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61414172755 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498866213152 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4752751094 48.9658058833 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.15 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198171414927 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550305944082 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459816852948 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114642175488 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499943914032 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.