In a meeting classroom meeting, when a teacher or the leader of the meeting say something incorrect, people tends to develop different behavior. Some would interrupt the meeting and correct it right then, while other may would overlook and say nothing. However, both of these behavior are not the best solution. Personally, I think that wait until the class or meeting is over and tell the teacher or the leader when people are gone is the best way to address this situation.
First and foremost, the first solution has some noticeable drawback that it is a little bit rude. It is undeniable that interrupting other people’s speech make them feels uncomfortable. When I was the president of friends club, I had also met this situation. During my speech on the first day of the club, a student roughly stand up and claimed that one of the club rules was unsuitable and he forced us to fix it right then. At first, his arguments seemed reasonable, but the way he talk was unconvincing and it made me really uncomfortable because other students stared at me like I am guilty for that. At last, because our club could not hold it more, so we decided to ask him to leave us. However, if that person stay back until the end of the meeting and tell me and my club leaders, other students may have the different attitude and we might think about that guy with a better look. In brief, that is the reason I would prefer to wait until the end of the meeting to tell the leaders without other audiences.
Moreover, the second choice would cause a lack of understanding each other. To be more precise, without exchanging ideas, people cannot understand other. I used to have a very close friend at my primary school, but we are pretty far now. When we in grade 5th, he and I got a fight and because we went to different secondary schools after that so our cold war had not been solve. Nowadays, although we are not mad at each other anymore, my friend and I cannot talk normally anymore because we don’t really understand the other. In fact, it is hard to maintain friendships without having conversation. Similar to this, the situation that this essay is focussing also have the same effects. Indeed, the leader or teacher cannot understand what a person want if he/she does not bring out their ideas. In fact, to develop the quality of the class or the next meeting, members should share their ideas with each others.
Ultimately, when a leader or a teacher said something incorrect, people should wait until the end of the meeting or class and talk with the teacher or leader without other audiences. The reason is this solution is polite and it allows people to understand each other. In fact, people should watch after each other to enhance their friendship.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 82
- TPO-10 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-04 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...ld interrupt the meeting and correct it right then, while other may would overlook an...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this behavior' or 'these behaviors'?
Suggestion: this behavior; these behaviors
...rlook and say nothing. However, both of these behavior are not the best solution. Personally, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...s some noticeable drawback that it is a little bit rude. It is undeniable that interruptin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...s unsuitable and he forced us to fix it right then. At first, his arguments seemed re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'talks'.
Suggestion: talks
...ments seemed reasonable, but the way he talk was unconvincing and it made me really ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
...after that so our cold war had not been solve. Nowadays, although we are not mad at e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, second, so, then, while, i think, in brief, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2284.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 489.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67075664622 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52528003191 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470347648262 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3241854295 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118491930781 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380421408941 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656326708662 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10247960867 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954605807306 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.