The college life is not as easy as it seems, students have several situations in which they learn how to handle life problems, even so, teachers or college leader can commit some errors which should not be just avoided. In my opinion, if my teacher in an ongoing class makes a mistake, I would wait until the class finishes and then I correct him being kind and polite. Therefore, I would make him either to correct his mistake the next day in class or to think over it.
First of all, there is no doubt that professors give extremely good material for our future which will help as in our jobs or simply in general life. However, when they fall in an erroneous thing, they can cast lots of doubt in the proved science. For example, I was in my math class trying to solve a calculus problem but I could not solve it because the formula given by the professor was wrong, so, I went through my math book and found the exact formula and then went forward the professor and in a kindly way I corrected his formula with my findings. But, I did it after the class.
Furthermore, teachers usually tend to make mistakes just for making students doubt and realized what is going on, or maybe when a student is not paying attention they do the same. But, the problem comes when they do not show the truth, students, even not paying attention, hear something that the professor said which can cause a lot of problems when they come home and study it. Actually, that is how students learn things wrong because they do not either check whether what the teacher said was correct or not, or knowing the truth they let it go without telling the professor about it.
To sum up, in my point of view if teachers say something erroneous, students should help them by correcting them, but when they have finished. Because, if they just go away without saying anything, all the class will have a problem then. And also students need to bring into question what they learn from the professor, one of the good ways to do this is researching.
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types of stone; most are about 70 mm in 78
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- TPO-19 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya 80
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a kindly way" with adverb for "kindly"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and then went forward the professor and in a kindly way I corrected his formula with my finding...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, even so, for example, in general, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48378378378 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27050352727 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.459389493 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4615384615 20.6045352989 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 5.45110844103 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116460359066 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458793838851 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260439854532 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0776079123839 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289767967639 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 58.1214874552 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.