I disagree with this statement. I believe that is not important to know what is happening around the world, because it is more important to focus only on what is happening in our own country.
To begin with, it is well known that the news on television is most of the time bad news, they usually reporting about wars, conflicts and dead people. These are the kind of news negatively affects my attitude and my mood. For example, one day I was watching the BBC news on TV and they were reporting about a journalist most probably murdered because she was working on a case of corrupted politicians. This news really made upset for the rest of my day, I could not stop to think in what horrible world we live, and the fact that we cannot do anything about it, it is how the world goes. This is one reason why I believe that knowing about what happening around the world it is not so important.
Second, nowadays people are always in a harsh and do not have much time to get informed about everything is happening in the world. We have limited time it is better to inform about what is happening near us rather than about countries that lay on the other side of the world. For example, it is more useful knowledge about the weather before we go to work, in this way we can properly choose our clothes and do not take the risk to get sick because we did not bring an umbrella with us. And, maybe if the road that leads us to the place where we work it is blocked for a car accident, or simply be informed about the traffic before to go to an important job interview.
Finally, sometimes we are not even able to judge if news is true or is a fake news, because most of the time we do not know much about the real situation in other countries, whereas we can readily recognize a fake news when they are reporting facts from places near us and that we know very well. These are the reasons why I do not consider knowing about world event it is not so important to me; they most of the time are bad news, I do not have much time to follow them and because I cannot really recognize if they are fake news, because they reporting facts from places that I do not much about.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 3
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725-1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has b 73
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 76
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, really, second, so, well, whereas, for example, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.22409638554 4.8611393121 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24713491557 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436144578313 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9072663794 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.846153846 100.406767564 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9230769231 20.6045352989 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223497018642 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100710809398 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05720520334 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161200098753 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462922582717 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.79 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.