Nowadays, the advent of technology provides a vast range of challenges and problems. The way how someone can conquer the challenges has been under deliberation amongst modern society. In this regard, some people think in order to face a problem that requires creativity it is better to work alone. There is an opposing viewpoint which, suggests to work in a group is a better way to face a task that requires creativity. I am personally in favor of the latter approach. I assert my viewpoint for three reasons and will illustrate them in the following.
The first aspect to be mentioned is, working in a group multiple the creativity. To be more clear, any person has developed himself in a specific aspect, one can be a great programmer, while another is a great poet. Working together provides an environment in which, people can participate positively and effectively. As a result, the group is able to conquer a wide range of tasks, likewise, they are able to solve a specific challenging task with more creativity that comes from any individual participating in the group. To clarify my point, let take the research and development part of a company as an example. In this society, researches have shown that if people work together on a problem, it would be more efficient than giving everybody a separated task to do. This is the result of the fact that when people work in the group they generate more creativity than they do when they work alone.
Apart from the point discussed above, working in a group on a task require less time and energy. in an effort to illustrate my point, take solving a puzzle as an example. When one tries to solve a puzzle all by himself, it requires a lot of time and energy, but if he shares the puzzle with a group of friends, the puzzle would solve in less amount of time and with less exhaustion. So working in a group on a challenging task would be more efficient and leads to more promising results.
The last but not the least, working in a group provides a friendly environment in which, people would enjoy the process of solving a task, not only the promising result is precious but also the cooperation amongst the group is worthy. On the other hand, working alone is not that enjoyable.
All in all, based on the aforementioned points and example. I prefer working in a group for facing a task rather than working alone on it. there are others opinion that it is better to work alone. They cling to their point because they believe working alone leads to results that they seek. But I believe working in a group is more efficient and also more fun.
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 73
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 76
- TPO-23 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...on a task require less time and energy. in an effort to illustrate my point, take ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, likewise, so, while, apart from, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62634989201 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6545814126 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423326133909 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 683.1 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8572005099 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2916666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0618981636022 0.236089414692 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191810506549 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251620631758 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374301370393 0.150856017488 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163725773443 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.