Nowadays, having a good plan has a crucial role in our life. A good plan can bring us great success. Regarding this issue, it is a long-lasting debate among the authorities that because modern life is very complicated, young people need to have the ability to plan and organize. From my perspective, it is necessary for young people that they should have the ability to plan and organize. In subsequent paragraphs, I will elaborate on my point of view cogently.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that these days I can say without a shadow of a doubt by proper planning and organization, we can achieve high efficiency in our life. In other words, in that complicated world, we have many kinds of tasks and duties. And, some of these tasks are more important than some others, so, by the excellent ability to planning and organization, we can recognize which one of these tasks should be performed at first.
Another equally noteworthy point in corroborating this issue is that by the ability to planning and organization, we can save more time. The advent of new technologies causes everything to go fast. Hence, saving time has a vital role in this world. For example, last year, I had a chemistry exam at university, and at that time, I spent more than three hours on social media every day. So, as a result, I failed in my exam. After that, I decided to decrease the time that I spent on social media and, I managed my time, and I had planned all my tasks. As a result, I could handle all my activities and achieve a good grade in my exams.
In brief, all the reasons mentioned above lead us to the conclusion that the ability to plan and organize is a crucial factor for young people. And, the vast majority of the experts and socialists firmly believe its advantages undoubtedly outweigh its drawbacks.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- TPO 54 Integrated Writing Task 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve internet access than to improve public transportation 80
- Do you agree or disagree Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 60
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, regarding, so, for example, in brief, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63271604938 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72687761556 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7537417604 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2941176471 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192675988046 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621146707876 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748895901837 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123139073064 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855757362532 0.0645574589148 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.