There is no shortage of debates whether it is better to have some friends in your life for having entertainments with them, solving your problems and leaning on them in hard situations. In this regard, Some individuals hold the view that It is of vital importance to make many new friends in different periods of their life. However, there are other opinions that It is essential to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. I am personally inclined to believe that the former approach pales in comparison to the latter. In following paragraphs some cogent reason has been elaborated in order to elucidate some obscure points in this framework.
The first pivotal reason which exhorted me to opt this point of view is that it is crystal clear long time friendships makes them stronger. Your close friends know your identity because in a variety of situation they were beside you. On the grounds that they are familiar whit your type, they know how to make you happy. By way of illustration, I have a couple of friends which we have been in a relationship since our childhood. During our nurturing, we went to the same school. So, we have been along with each other and have made a close friendship. They knew that I do love adventurous activities. For the gift of my twenty-year-old birthday, they gifted me a ticket for a trip to a wonderful place, Disneyland! It was the most splendid gift I ever had. If they did not know my characteristic, they could not make me so happy. This example clarifies how your close friend can bring happiness to your life even in a small number.
The other equally compelling reason in corroborating my stance is that new friend that you faced them in your university or work are temporary and never know you properly. In my idea, You can rely on them because they might have completely different behavior from you. It is worth mentioning that their behavior in some ways can even hurt you. My friend's experience drives the concept home. Last year, my friend, Sarah, was a newcomer to a big company. As she is a sociable type, she made friends with one of her colleagues. They had some dates after the work. After a while, she recognized that the other colleagues knew every secret that she had said to her friend. So, she found that her friend makes this friendship with everyone and said everybody's secret to others. "Did I rely on my old friends and said them my secret instead of new one, I would not hurt like that", Sarah remarked.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer although some people like making friends easily, it is indispensable to have some old close friends even in a small group. for the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating; first; your old friend understand you; secondly, the new friends are not reliable. So, as the writer's advice, I urge people to protect their old friends and try hard to maintain them.
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 85
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task In 1957 a European silver coin dating to the eleventh century was discovered at a Native American archaeological site in the state of Maine in the United States. Many people believed the coin had been originally brought to 78
- TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends 70
- TPO-48 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... essential to maintain friendships with a small number of people for a long time. I am personally...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some obscure points in this framework. The first pivotal reason which exhorted ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ld close friends even in a small group. for the sake of brevity, a couple of points...
^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ew friends are not reliable. So, as the writers advice, I urge people to protect their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 92.0 43.0788530466 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 1977.66487455 122% => OK
No of words: 517.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68471953578 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65114260364 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479690522244 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 23.0 9.59856630824 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9074663108 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4642857143 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.67857142857 5.45110844103 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213523188105 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621834767784 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602572595267 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146685590145 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040229683093 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.