Nowadays, almost all universities suggest a wide range of courses that are not obligatory /mandatory/ for students. In this regard, personally, I am prone to believe that history is important for every /each/ student regardless of the area of specialty /major in which a student specializes in/. I hold this opinion since this discipline is an indispensable part of our general education; and it is a prerequisite for becoming a better specialist.
To begin with, historical courses are essential for the general development since history is often the key for understanding the reality and predicting the future. Among other things it reveals the cause-and-effect relationship between two phenomena and, thus, explains their nature. For example, as members of society all of us are interested in political events that occur in our countries, and, therefore, we often analyze them to understand what is waiting us in future. However, the mentioned analysis would be incomplete if we do not pay due attention to the causes and possible historical links of the current events. So, history is necessary for intelligent approach toward the real life and its better understanding.
Additionally, learning events that occurred in the past is necessary for professional development and growth. This is due to the fact that history, in particular, reveals the patterns of social relations. For example, I am lawyer whose specialty is the Constitutional law – a subject which explores the basic principles of foundation and functioning of states. I have studied this subject for about 10 years and can assure everyone that without learning the legal history in general, I would not have been able to succeed in my career and fully comprehend the peculiarities of modern constitutional states. Thus, history is essential in any field of research and expertize.
To sum up briefly, learning history helps us become full members of societies /where/ we live in. The explanation to this is twofold: first, history spreads light to the reality; and, second, it is a crucial element of our professional education.
- TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TOEFL T P O 32 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- Advertisements do not convey correct information about products. 66
- "Ecocertified" wood for American people 80
- Birds' population will decrease as a result of growth of human population 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e them to understand what is waiting us in future. However, the mentioned analysis would ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, in general, in particular, of course, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28358208955 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13402415013 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1032122791 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981385274114 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033431402161 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258317922939 0.0737576698707 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589602781223 0.150856017488 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162114193345 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.