tpo21.
This set of the material in the both reading and lecture is about genetic modification through which people are able to modify genetic characteristics of species to enhance the quality of trees. The reading provides three pieces of evidence indicating that this process would be effective, creating many advanteges both economically and environmentally. The lecturer, nonetheless, refutes the author's claims by offering three counterclaims.
First, the reading posits that GMtrees are able to survive when unpredictable incidents like abrupt changing in weather condition and insects is occurring. The lecturer, conversely, takes the view that at first glance, it would be a creative idea; however, if people modify trees against insect and other problems, they will be genetically unified. As result, they cannot resist aginst different kinds of insects since they have been changed for specific condition. Under this circumstances, facing extiction is undeniable.
Second, the reading brings up this point that people can gain considerable profit since these trees are able to produce more crops and fruits. In contrast, the lecturer disputes this point by arguing that this method is not purely economical because of having hidden cost for farmers. For example, not only do farmers have to pay significant amount for GMseeds, they also are required to allocate some proportion of their profit for the companies from which they purchse these seeds.
Third, the reading sheds light on this fact that protecting wild tree from overexploitation would be another positive consequence of GMtrees. The professors casts doubt on this point due to the fact that making changes in genes of species will contribute to serious damage to the wild trees. These trees are growing so rapidly that by consuming soil nutrition, and more sunlight by GMtrees, native plant would be deprived of these natural resources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-05 | mahyarshah | 3 | view |
| 2015-01-18 | monamh | 80 | view |
- TPO. A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. Agree or disagree. 70
- tpo16. integrated 80
- Young people today are better able to make decision for their own lives than they were in the past. 70
- Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 93
- 75 Today people cannot buy products based on information in the advertisements because advertisements are less honest than before Agree or disagree 90
Sentence: Under this circumstances, facing extiction is undeniable.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and circumstances
Sentence: The reading provides three pieces of evidence indicating that this process would be effective, creating many advanteges both economically and environmentally.
Error: advanteges Suggestion: advantages
Sentence: As result, they cannot resist aginst different kinds of insects since they have been changed for specific condition.
Error: aginst Suggestion: against
Sentence: Under this circumstances, facing extiction is undeniable.
Error: extiction Suggestion: extinction
Sentence: For example, not only do farmers have to pay significant amount for GMseeds, they also are required to allocate some proportion of their profit for the companies from which they purchse these seeds.
Error: purchse Suggestion: purchase
Sentence: Third, the reading sheds light on this fact that protecting wild tree from overexploitation would be another positive consequence of GMtrees.
Error: overexploitation Suggestion: over exploitation
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
Double check spelling errors.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 25 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 296 350
No. of Characters: 1572 1500
No. of Different Words: 182 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.148 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.311 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.707 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 93 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.769 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.329 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.615 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.565 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.036 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5