TPO22
An issue of concern turning into as obsession for many people is the impressions of a teacher on their students, especially in political and social matters. For this reason, a large proportion of people consent to the statement that teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students. Personally, I completely confirm the opinion. My reasons are manifold, among which the huge negative impact of a teacher on students, the increase in the struggle in classroom, and loss of concentration on education are the most substantial.
Beyond a shadow of a doubt, teachers and instructors are one of the prominent figures in students’ life, especially teenagers. It is crystal clear that their behaviors (treatments) and attitudes directly affect students. For this reason, they should be aware of what they say or do in the classroom. For instance, I remember several years ago when I was a 12-year-old teen. We have a teacher who was indeed important to us and almost all pupils put him on the pedestal, but when he talked about some political issues a large number of students became eager to politic which was not a good matter in those ages.
With the advent of humans’ modern society, there are a wide variety of viewpoints throughout the world. Therefore, it is prevalent that in a classroom there are some individuals with various opinions. Hence, talking about social or political topics augments the probability of triggering an argument. According to a research, done by the Tehran University, the teachers who enter different topics except that the education, have more conflict with their students. This translates into that the further a teacher talks about irrelevant topics, the higher struggle they face.
Although several people believe that political and social subjects are parts of education which teachers must focus on, a plethora of people have the opposite point of view. They argue that such discussions bring about adverse effects on the students’ education. Consequently, avoiding these discussions certainly reduce (cut down) the ability of pupils to concentrate on the education materials.
To sum up, considering aforementioned reasons helps us to draw the conclusion that teacher should elude to discussing their political and social point of views, since it has numerous disadvantages such as influencing students’ attitude toward politic, making a contradiction in the classroom, and disordering the learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-09 | James Douvyl | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | MinaSh | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | farbdabbasi | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-19 | ghazalsaed1995 | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 521, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n he talked about some political issues a large number of students became eager to politic which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., and disordering the learning process.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, talking about, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38167938931 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03065933174 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7249745015 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.