Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class
Throughout history, education methods have been altering dramatically. In contrast to the past that when students just listened to their teachers, and they were the only one talking in the class, modern education system encourages educators to let the pupils take part in class discussion further. Although a plethora of people contend that communicating with other classmates in the course of teaching may be influential, I, to a great extent, take the opposing perspective that students should make their efforts to learn as much as possible in the class. My reasons are manifold, among which the most conspicuous ones are substantiated in the following paragraphs.
To commence with, the first exquisite point to be mentioned is the importance of paying attention during a lecture. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, focusing on the teacher's talk, the student can gain more information and knowledge. They are able to take notes completely as the teacher is providing some information. On the contrary, if learners discuss and communicate with class, there is less possibility that they can get the majority of helpful materials which are presented by the teacher. Moreover, it is indeed arduous to for a lecturer to keep the focus on the speech while the audiences are talking, on the grounds that any noise is interrupting and distracting. Hence, the more discussions exist in the class, the less engaging lecture the teacher can provide.
Besides the influences on discussing during class time, it is worth mentioning that pupils do not have access to their teacher all day long, but they spend more time with their friends. As a result, it is more reasonable that they make attempt to take advantage of information given in the class since they do not access those informative materials in other situations. As a matter of fact, learning in the class is the more efficient approach in comparison to information they can obtain from other sources, including discussion, due to the fact it is organized in a logical order that can help learners to understand them instantly. For instance, students can learn many things during class, and then they discuss the topic in their meeting with other classmates. Hence, they both get a large proportion of what is stated in lecture and share their knowledge, viewpoint, and attitude in their meeting of class.
To sum up, considering the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it is better to pay all the attention to what is said during a class since it brings numerous advantages. Not only does it contribute to gaining more information, but it also augments students' learning process. Overall, school students should concentrate on the talk in the class, and in different sessions share their information with classmates .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 288, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... but it also augments students learning process. Overall, school students should concen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... share their information with classmates .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in contrast, as a matter of fact, as a result, in contrast to, on the contrary, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2340.0 1977.66487455 118% => OK
No of words: 456.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13157894737 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89242641283 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519736842105 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9663975464 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.45110844103 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283090286092 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088541888344 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665278449667 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178280293821 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027218407746 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.