Archaeologists problem to study artifacts
The author enumerates some possible problems to indicate that studying cultural artifacts is encountered with numerous limitations. The lecturer, however, refutes the presented idea in the reading by mentioning some counterclaims since she firmly believes that some new rules, enact in 19th, made big changes in the field and improved many things.
First, the author claims that a myriads of artifacts have not been discovers or they were destroyed due to a lot of constructions have be done in recent decades. Nonetheless, the professor withdraws the statement and points out a portion of the novel guide line. She alludes to the point that before excavating the locations in the Great Britain, the site must be examined by archaeologists. In the next step, the organization and government should collaborate with each other in order to make plan to preserve the artifacts. In addition, the construction cannot be proceeded before paving the steps.
Second, according to the reading, there is not much enough support for archaeological research, on the grounds that most fund is allocated by governments. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on the assertion. She posits that based on the new rule, the money, for doing research in a given site, is paid by construction companies. She adds that they allot initial expense. For this reason, new sources of funds have been found than were not present in the past.
Third, the reading asserts that it is too cumbersome to fine a career in the field of archaeology, and many researchers change their major and job. Conversely, the lecturer holds the opposite viewpoint since she thinks that there are a majority of positions which did not exist in the past. She argues that researchers are involved in a wide variety of stages, including site examination, making plan, writing article, and so forth. Hence, there is an increase in the number of positions available for archaeologists highest amount than has been till now.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | ayumiyazaki | 75 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | ayumiyazaki | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2024-01-07 | saba.es | 80 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | TiOluwani97 | 87 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
... things. First, the author claims that a myriads of artifacts have not been discovers or...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...oyed due to a lot of constructions have be done in recent decades. Nonetheless, th...
^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...point since she thinks that there are a majority of positions which did not exist in the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 502, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'archaeologists the highest'.
Suggestion: archaeologists the highest
...n the number of positions available for archaeologists highest amount than has been till now.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, third, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12693498452 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87598602446 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603715170279 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3993036626 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.095141325128 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0259517617283 0.0996497079465 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696876552822 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0526546422218 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558788762614 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 63.6247240618 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.