Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class.
Which one do you prefer? Use specific reasons and detailed examples to support your answer.
In the modern-day, education plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance educational systems. This issue of whether or not students should listen to teachers during a lecture or speaking with each other has provoked controversy among human beings. I personally believe that learners have achieved several advantageous if they listen to the educators during the teaching process. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor to take into account is that the importance of paying attention during the lecture. To shed more light on this matter, in the class, the teacher speaks about sundry topics, which are arduous lessons, such as math, physics, and chemistry; hence, it is important that students listen carefully and take notes completely as the teacher is providing some information. In this situation, students would learn their lessons deeply, and they use the presence of their teachers impressively. Nevertheless, if students communicate during the class and do not listen to the teacher carefully, they would not achieve adequate knowledge from their educators. Moreover, speakers need to concentrate and focus on the speech while the audiences are talking; hence, any noise is interrupting and distracting their attention. Additionally, such problems cause the less engaging lecture the teacher can provide.
Another equally significant point is that students have limited access to the teacher. To elaborate on this point, students must listen to the class attentively and achieve all materials which the teacher teaches. In this situation, if they do not use the educator's information during lectures, they have to either read extra books which are helping students to learn their lessons or spend a lot of money for the tutor teachers. Also, both of such solutions do not have influential results. Furthermore, in the upper levels, students will face a variety of problems with their lessons if they do not learn all aspects of lessons deeply and impressively. For instance, consider a student who accepts at a university as a civil engineering. In this situation, if he does not know all aspects of math, such as differential or integral, without any doubts, he will struggle with hazardous and arduous lessons at the university, and he would not pass them readily.
Taking all aforementioned reasons and examples into account, we may draw the conclusion that students should listen carefully to the teacher during the lecture. I believe that students not only learn all aspects of lessons deeply but also they use their teacher.
- TPO 49 - Integrated writing 73
- In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 83
- Essay topics: TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 85
- Some people prefer to focus on ambitious dreams while others think realistic goals are moreimportant. Which do you prefer and why? 71
- TPO 43 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. Owing to it is paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ance educational systems. This issue of whether or not students should listen to teachers duri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'educators'' or 'educator's'?
Suggestion: educators'; educator's
... this situation, if they do not use the educators information during lectures, they have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36596736597 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85932949881 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7462779027 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233073225169 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732474323896 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569014032875 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156956413804 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488045813297 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.