Students in high school should learn by sitting there listening to the teacher while
taking notes or communicating and sharing ideas with class.
Which one do you prefer? Use specific reasons and detailed examples to support
your answer.
In present-day societies, education has played a prominent role all around the world. Owing to paramount importance, large numbers of scientists have been always searching for ways to enhance educational systems. A controversial question that deserves some words here is that whether students in high school increase their learning by listening to teachers or participating in the class discussion or not. I assert that listening to professors brings several positive points for students. In the following, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor into account is the importance of learning in classes. To shed more light on this matter, scientists believe that the most influential parts of learning are occurred at the school by listening to teachers. In other words, students have a limited time for spending by teachers and learning adequate information from them so that pupils would increase their focus on the class by listening to teachers. Consider a math’s class for instance. Math is one of the important lessons that are fundamental to other lessons like physics and chemistry; hence, learning at a high level helps pupils to pass all lessons in the best ways. Furthermore, if students do not learn it in class, they would struggle with various problems in the process of studying. I believe that adequate learning will have happened if students can both focus and concentrate in the class and listen to a teacher carefully.
Another equally significant point assert is that speaking in the class disrupts the learning process. To elaborate on this point, when teachers want to teach lessons, they need to have adequate concentration on their teaching till they teach all lessons in the best ways. Hence, if students speak and disrupt the teacher’s talk, they would forget what they want to teach. Hence, the more discussions exist in the class, the less engaging lecture the teacher can provide. Moreover, by listening students not only do take a note but also centralize lessons; hence, the learning process will have happened in an excellent and efficient situation. Additionally, after a lecture, teachers determine a special time for students that can either ask questions or share ideas.
Having taken all the aforementioned reasons and examples, into account, we may draw the conclusion that students should listen to their teachers during a lecture. I believe that pupils not only do concentrate on materials of classes but also teachers teach in efficient ways.
- TPO 40 70
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice Why Reading about the places online Discussing them 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing sports can teach people lessons about life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 75
- TPO 60 3
- TPO 29 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84771429247 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 623.7 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2905795449 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.578947368 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235995549803 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747440253146 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516999174549 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149943415554 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286211134882 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.