Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
In the modern era, a film has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, most filmmakers have searched many ways to enhance a film's influence. A controversial question which is often raised this idea is whether when a film is produced based on a book, people should watch the mentioned movie and then read a book or vice versa. I would rather see a film before reading the film's book. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first factor to be mentioned is that watching a film helps people to analysis it easily. To elaborate on my point, most of the books have many characters; furthermore, the number of characters will be increased in each chapter. In this situation, a person who read a book would be confused. And, he or she thinks that the book is complex and obscure. On the other hand, if a person watches a film sooner than read the book, he or she can analysis the book better. Consider the Game of Thrones book for instance. In this book, the writer tries to add some characters with a certain ability in each season. I think, if individuals red the book sooner than watch the film, they would be confused. But, watching the film helps the viewer to recognize all characters easily so that they can enjoy reading the book.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that people who watch a movie before reading a book, the film become more interested. To elucidate my claim, when people read a book at first, they have information about all the events that will happen during a film. In this situation, the film does not have exciting for this person to following each episode. In contrast, when individuals do not watch a film, they would not anticipate the next episodes and events during a film so that the film becomes exciting for these them. The Game of Thrones would merit example. In the last episode of the 5th seasons, the film shows that Jun who is one of the most important characters died. It is a drawback event in the film, but he did not die. In this situation, If the people read the book, the understand what happens. Therefore, the film does not have existed for them.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that watching the film before reading the film's book has many advantageous points. I believe that watching a film before reading a book not only helps people become familiar with the characters but also helps them to experience a huge exciting.
- TPO 27 70
- TPO23 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The most important way to improve people’s health is to clean the environment. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important way to improve people s health is to clean the environment 45
- TPO 18 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 791, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...situation, If the people read the book, the understand what happens. Therefore, the film does ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 43.0788530466 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64205816555 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54600480049 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.438478747204 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4009108808 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.88 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245018482355 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783150092607 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777451362727 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172899626485 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188352819768 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.