Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
In the modern era, a film has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, researchers have always searched many ways for enhancing films quality. Some people may hold the view that seeing a film than reading a film's book has several metrics points. However, some others may take the opposite viewpoint and believe that reading a book and then watching a book's movie has a better effect on the viewers. I content that watching a film at first has better effects on viewers. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first important factor to be mentioned is that seeing a film without reading a book would increase the excitement of the film. To elaborate on my point, when viewers want to watch a film without reading a book, they are more exciting for continuing a film. They following each episode of the film, and they try to watch a film on time - exactly the film published. In this situation, the film is unpredictable, and people want to see it for knowing about events on it. I believe that it has more enjoyable for viewers because they do not have information about events in the film. But, if a person reads a book and then wants to see the film, she would have a lot of information about the events and location of the film. I think the film does not attract to a viewer.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that a film which makes base on a book has a lot of characters. To shed more light on this matter, since a film is made base on a book, it would have plentiful characters. In this situation, earning information about each character may be difficult. If individuals watch a film before reading a book, they will know and familiar with characters. Therefore, analysis and reading a book will be easier. Consider the game of thrones, for instance. This film is made base on a book. In each episode, plentiful characters are added to the film, and each of them has a special role and characteristic. If people start to read a book without watching a film, they may face trouble with recognize and analysis characters. In this situation, the reader may confuse and stop to read a book.
All in all, considering the aforementioned reason leads us to the conclusion that watching a film before reading a film's book has several positive points. I believe that seeing a film without reading a book not only would increase the excitement of the film but also would make a better background for reading a book.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'books'' or 'book's'?
Suggestion: books'; book's
...that reading a book and then watching a books movie has a better effect on the viewer...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 484, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bettered'.
Suggestion: bettered
...ntent that watching a film at first has better effects on viewers. In the following pa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66071428571 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67176861424 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404017857143 0.524837075471 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9783018456 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.52 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.92 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.12 5.45110844103 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184065905164 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683653575062 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585490833169 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136446624285 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424791668177 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.