TPO 45
The lecture and the reading discuss whether bees existed in the Earth as early as 200 million years, or not. Although the passage claims that several theories show the bees may not live 200 million years ago, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the reading points out that the earliest bees fossils are discovered 100 million years ago; hence, the bees would not live 200 million years ago. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that actually, trees about 200 million years ago did not produce resin - it is a sticky liquid that bees used for their nests- or some trees produce very rarely. The main structure of the bees nest was resin. Therefore, their nests would not remain from 200 million years, but bees were lived 200 million years ago.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that 200 million years ago, flowering plants would not exist, so the bees could not live at that time. However, the professor argues that before existing flowering plants in the Earth, bees have eaten non-flowering plants such as the fern. During evolutionary some flowering plants grown and bees changed their food to the flowering plants; thus, this is a new relationship between flowering plants and bees.
Finally, although the reading passage says that some fossils are discovered in Arizona and they are as the same as bee nests. But they do not have chambers made by bees. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that the lack of chambers do not mean that the fossils were not made by bees. She adds that bees were a product of some chemical component for resistant water. When these fossils are chemically analysed, they show that they have a chemical component that produced by bees. As a result, these fossils belong to the bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'rarely' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
...their nests- or some trees produce very rarely. The main structure of the bees nest wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93527508091 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28108313539 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491909385113 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4458345379 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.27373068433 281% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0945518457501 0.272083759551 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389701388792 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247614596457 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0614923171795 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00978682530599 0.0443174109184 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.