TPO37
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
People’s performance has attracted much social concern. Several experts argue that people are
unlikely to carry out all of their works well because they have many things to do. Personally, I
strongly agree with this argument.
On one hand, what has been put under consideration is low productivity. It is widely known
that people only have twenty-four hours per day. Thus, by taking many works, they are bound
to have a very limited amount of time to spend on each task. As a consequence, it is impossible
for them to have enough time to practicing and learning for each field. For this reason, people
are unlikely to gain the required skills and experience for the task they take. Hence, they are
certain to incomplete the job. More notably, it cannot be denied that executing a wide range of
jobs demands a lot of energy and endurance which are beyond the people’s control.
Subsequently, there is likelihood that people feel exhausted and overwhelmed. Obviously, it is
understandable that people are struggling with mental illnesses such as stress and anxiety.
Therefore, they are unable to maintain their interest with their tasks. As a result, their
performance is likely to decrease dramatically in these works. Without doubts, getting a lot of
works done taking a lot of things into consideration is certainly undeniable when it comes to
low productivity.
On the other hand, some might say that taking a lot of things into consideration is a wonderful
chance for people to learn from a variety of disciplines. Accordingly, they definitely apply the
knowledge from one field to another. By doing that, it is unquestionable that people are able to
have all of their works done. However, it is just the surface of the problem. In fact, not every
subject is relative and is likely to be a useful tool for other subjects. Moreover, most people
don’t have sufficient ability to make such application. Thus, it is impossible for them to
complete their jobs with knowledge from other fields. Besides, even if people are bound to be
exposed to different situations by doing many things, this exposition also is considered as
adverse because they always have to worry about what they are going to do next.
Consequently, there is likelihood for them not to pay attention to the matter that they are
carrying out. Therefore, they are unable to meet their one hundred percent capability and show
their true potential. Undoubtedly, people are bound to accomplish fewer things effectively. By
and large, saying that people are capable of getting all of their works done even if they take
huge number of works is highly unrealistic.
In a word, low productivity and inefficiency performance is convincing reasons for my
agreement. It is highly recommended that experts should take my writing into detailed
consideration to guideline an appropriate decision on people’s performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
- Tpo51 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- TPO37 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 73
- TPO37 integrated writing Question Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific points made in the reading passage 70
- TPO22 Independent A D Teachers should not make their political or social views known to students in classroom 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 15.1003584229 238% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18067226891 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93092149779 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504201680672 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7512038063 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0344827586 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4137931034 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06896551724 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 32.0 4.53405017921 706% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226466650218 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056712605017 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068435606646 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569323710883 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633125491747 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 15.1003584229 238% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18067226891 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93092149779 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504201680672 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 763.2 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7512038063 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0344827586 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4137931034 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06896551724 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 32.0 4.53405017921 706% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226466650218 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056712605017 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068435606646 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0569323710883 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633125491747 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.