We are now living in a time, where world is much more faster than previous and people tend to enthusiastically advocate the importance of multitasking, It is generally appreciated to have the capability of performing disparate types of tasks in parallel. However, I personally think that, it might not be always beneficial to do different things if someone is not able to concentrate fully on all of his tasks. Therefore, I agree with the statement above and the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most compelling reasons.
First of all, taking responsibility of too many tasks at a same time creates a tremendous pressure on health and mind. Consequently, it would be hard to complete all of the tasks in hand efficiently. For instance, as a software engineer, I have to perform multiple kinds of jobs at a same time, like implement new feature, support release and fix issues, make documents, prepare training materials and attend in regular meetings. Sometimes I feel that, it is very difficult to manage all of these tasks and even in my free time, I have to think about all of the pending tasks. Thus, not only it effects my efficiency but also it has detrimental effect on my physical and mental health.
Furthermore, the most common problem of people is inability to assign priority of each tasks. It is crucial to prepare tasks that need to be performed and consider priority of each item. To make a schedule of each task helps one to complete his work with more efficacy. For example, who is planning to go abroad for higher study need to perform many tasks within a very short time. He has to prepare for GRE or TOEFL, study research papers, search for university which provide degree on his domain, prepare resume and other docs, manage money to apply etc, If he tries to do all of those things at a same time, it might results in lower performance in each category. It might happen that he gets lower score in TOEFL as he was too busy in online courses to prepare his study material. Hence, it is required to set priority and complete those tasks one after another.
Finally, rather than doing many things at a time, people should have make long term plan. It is not easy to take so many tasks at a time and finish them at once. If someone wants to look himself as an expert in some field, he should take a long term plan and continue learning different topics on that field. Thus after few years, he can show that he has a portfolio that would be highly appreciated by experts on this field.
On the other hand, some people might want to take 3-4 months planning to learn everything at a time, which would not be effective and consequently he can not achieve his goal.
In conclusion, contemplating all the above reasons, I agree with the statement that, doing so many things at a time degrades quality of work and it should be avoided for better future.
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- TPO 21 - Genetically modified trees 97
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives. 86
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods-relatives of modern- 80
We are now living in a time,
We are now living in a time, where the world is much faster than previous and people tend to enthusiastically advocate the importance of multitasking, It is generally appreciated having the capability of performing disparate types of tasks in parallel. However, I personally think that, it might not be always beneficial to do different things if someone is not able to concentrate fully on all of his tasks. Therefore, I agree with the statement above and the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most compelling reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'faster' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: faster
...w living in a time, where world is much more faster than previous and people tend to enthus...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'appreciated having'.
Suggestion: appreciated having
...rtance of multitasking, It is generally appreciated to have the capability of performing disparate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...sequently, it would be hard to complete all of the tasks in hand efficiently. For instance...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... in my free time, I have to think about all of the pending tasks. Thus, not only it effect...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...earning different topics on that field. Thus after few years, he can show that he ha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2387.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 514.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6439688716 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63484538072 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501945525292 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0132520634 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4761904762 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150476225106 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047920605694 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556653572692 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964351716066 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685639386981 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.