TPO43: Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting the teacher or the meeting leaders said something incorrect in your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. interrupt and correct the mistake right away 2.wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader. 3. say nothing.
These days in the modern academic world, some rules and principles make a presentation or lecture efficient and acceptable. One of the key ones of these principles is respecting to the lecturer, staying silent, and avoid disturbing her/him. To my mind, it is a crucial factor that every audience should know. I think it is necessary to ask about the mistake to avoid misunderstanding, but we should consider these rules. Therefore, if I were in this hypothetical situation, I would rather stay silent and wait for the end of the class. I will give my reasons in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, as I mentioned above, Interrupting the lecturer is a kind of disrespect, and also, it can disturb the lecturer and cause him or her loose concentration, and, as a result, he/she may make another mistake or get anxious. When you are presenting, you have to try to be determined and focused to increase the quality. I remember that time that I was presenting my bachelor thesis, my supervisor constantly asked me questions, it made me nervous, and I was almost crying!
Moreover, sometimes saying the wrong things during teaching or situations like that is not on purpose. Hence interrupting the session for that is just a waste of time. For instance, I saw this a lot in university, when students correct the professor while all students know the right, and all have got the meaning. It adds nothing useful to the class.
To sum up, I strongly believe we should wait until the end, for any questions and even correcting a mistake. We can write our ideas and questions to don't forget them!
- Reading passage An airship is a type of aircraft that flies using a very large balloon filled with a lighter than air gas Airships were an important means of air transportation before the 1940s but are little used today having been largely replaced by air 85
- TPO 5 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 66
- TPO 66 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 76
- TPO43 Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting the teacher or the meeting leaders said something incorrect in your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do 1 interrupt and correct the mistake right away 2 wait until the class or meet 76
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...situations like that is not on purpose. Hence interrupting the session for that is ju...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...We can write our ideas and questions to dont forget them!
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, kind of, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 276.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80797101449 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90348086152 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.3577565016 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.091676540587 0.236089414692 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294287953706 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227070970727 0.0737576698707 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517337990723 0.150856017488 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111611002337 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.