Learning policy has been a burning global issue. Some counselors suggest that it is crucial for learners to get knowledge about ideas and concepts. Personally, I agree with this suggestion.
First and foremost, what I put in my priority is study efficiency. The fact is that ideas and concepts are certain to be about the origin of everything. Looking for them encourages the students to acquire a stable background. It is an essential element for students to perceive knowledge without encountering the obstacles. Therefore, they have a tendency to defeat all stressful moments when seating in the class. Thus, the efficiency rate of the learning process is supposed to be enhanced remarkably. More importantly, having a grasp in ideas and concepts stands a golden chance for students to improve their understanding of abstract knowledge. Subsequently, their imagining capability is bound to reach a higher level. This ability obviously brings students comfort when learning complex things. Correspondingly, their studying process tends to be filled with colorful moments. Beyond any doubt, comprehension in ideas and concepts is clearly a powerful ability to get triumph in the rivalry of taking knowledge.
On the other hand, it is claimed that concepts and ideas are extremely hard to appreciate. Consequently, the studying career of learners is caused to collapse. However, it is just applicable to a minority. In fact, teachers always find out suitable means of conveying knowledge to their students. For this reason, the students are supposed to break through the sturdy wall surrounding exotic knowledge. In addition, owning the grasp in origin of the problem, students tend to watch the defect of their life with a wise perspective. It is a crucial way to understand the surrounding problems profoundly. There is a likelihood that their curiosity in the knowledge about the world leaps to a peak floor. It follows that their life has a tendency to be filled with s great motivation. In that case, the inclination of focusing on studying is inevitable. As a result, their competition in comprehending the knowledge is prompted to be blooming. By and large, the claim that getting the grasp in concepts and ideas causes the studying failure is unrealistic.
In summary, for all the mentioned above, learning ideas and concepts is a wise method. It is strongly advised that counselors should take my writing into great consideration to guideline an appropriate policy on studying procedure.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in sponsoring arts than in athletics (like state Olympics team). 70
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- TPO-21 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 66
- TPO-42 - Integrated Writing Task 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to complex'
Suggestion: to complex
...y brings students comfort when learning complex things. Correspondingly, their studying...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in fact, in summary, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2109.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 399.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05050936351 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516290726817 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1532961204 48.9658058833 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.3214285714 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96428571429 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275271724839 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662827646411 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840270555542 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170045296692 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690314630106 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.