Due to the rapid development of science and technology, the invention of cars has largely benefited people's life by cutting the time on transportation. However, some people think the number of cars in use in the future will be decreasing. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the statement for the following three reasons.
To begin with, an abundance of cars in the road now seriously make us spend more time on commuting. When so many cars drive on the road, we are frequently bothered by the traffic jam, which cause our low efficiency on traffic. What is worse, there are a large amount of traffic accidents happened every day just because of the high density of cars. When we happen to meet an accident, the roads are blocked and we have to waste lots of time on the road. If the number of cars continue to increase, the efficiency on the road will be lower and lower, then everyone would prefer other ways of going out such as the subway rather than driving a car.
Another compelling reason contributing to the decreasing number of cars in future is that our environment cannot be polluted anymore. The planet we live in is severely polluted because of a great deal of fuse emitted by the cars. More and more people are getting sick because of the poor environment, and therefore the governments in every country are trying to propose some policies to protect our living conditions by restricting the use of cars of increasing the price of fuel, which definitely discourage people from driving cars.
Last but not least, there will be better vehicles to be invented in place of cars. With the advance of science and the development of the technology, scientists are now trying to address the serious problem caused by cars by inventing some new vehicles which do no harm to the environment and have higher speeds. For example, the invention of lift rails can be more environmental-friendly which are driven by the electricity instead of fuel. What's more, they have a higher speed.
In a nutshell, considering those eloquent reasons given above, we can come to a conclusion that the cars will be replaced by some more advanced vehicles, which may be more efficient with less pollution. Therefore, I think there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
- TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a nu 80
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO-52. Integrated Writing Task. Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 96
- TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a nu 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...affic. What is worse, there are a large amount of traffic accidents happened every day...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ven by the electricity instead of fuel. Whats more, they have a higher speed. In a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 43.0788530466 37% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75505050505 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76465564485 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4979546898 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.764705882 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275763096587 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104340227285 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152972651934 0.0737576698707 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171651787534 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10953278687 0.0645574589148 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.