In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Cars have been a revolution in facilitating human communication and transformation. A prediction on fewer cars being in use twenty years hence is a tough take, considering the fact that such an outcomes depends on several factors. Yet, according to me, this hypothesis is flawed, given the current trends pertaining to human commuting.
To start with, it is essential to emphasize on the fact that although the quantity of cars may not decrease, the quality and type of cars are sure to undergo a massive change. As the world is becoming more and more conscious about the environment, cars dependent on fossil fuels are likely to be replaced by electric cars. As electric shall become more convenient to use, these cars will be taken up by more individuals. Thus, contrary to the mentioned hypothesis, more cars may be in use than it is at present.
Moving on, the evolution of artificial intelligence and automation must also be taken into consideration. With car companies like Tesla coming into the picture, the incidence of road accidents, traffic jams and other road related hassel shall decrease manifold times. Resultantly, it would become more convenient for people to afford and drive cars than it is today.
Lastly, as more and more people continue to accumulate wealth, at least the top strata of income category being flocked by millionaires and billionaires, with rise in inequality, the absolute number of cars shall shoot up in no time. Considering lower prices of electric cars, less maintenance cost and negligible need of a driver's license - thanks to automatic cars, owning and driving cars shall become easier, convenient and enjoyable for people across all age groups.
To conclude, although it is too early to make a concrete claim, I would prefer to believe that, on the premise of the reasons stated, the number of cars in the upcoming years is likely to rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150 million year old mam mal known as Repenomomus robustus R robustus Interestingly the mammal s stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur Some researchers have therefore suggested that R rob 80
- The shrimping industry relies on trawls for its harvest Trawls are huge nets that are dragged behind boats in order to catch shrimp Other animals like sea turtles are often caught inside these nets and soon die without sufficient oxygen To help reduce the 78
- Soon technology will provide smart cars that virtually drives themselves A computer in the car determines the speed and route to the desired destination The computer is in continuous contact with a global positioning system and other technologies that wil 78
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture in general and for the futur 80
- A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature novels plays and poems than they used to This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public for culture in general and for the futur 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an outcome' or simply 'outcomes'?
Suggestion: an outcome; outcomes
...gh take, considering the fact that such an outcomes depends on several factors. Yet, accord...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, lastly, may, so, thus, at least, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03821656051 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84451176224 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585987261146 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.374020096 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.692307692 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327982946444 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110515594641 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905330830851 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15376492705 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750121773216 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.