While facing dilemma, of funding sports or libraries, most of the universities nowadays decide on dedicating largest portion of their budget to finance the former. I strongly disagree with this kind of approach and I'm going to argue against it by illustrating following reasons:
First of all, university is an educational institution, thus all of their effort and resources must be focused on students enlightenment. instead of doing so, money is simply wasted on entertainment purposes, that bring about no positive outcome in the long run.
Secondly, all the necessary infrastructure for sports is abundant all over the country. So everyone who wants to work or stretch out, and in short lead a healthy lifestyle can still easily do so. A decent library on the other hand is very hard to come by.
Looking at there facts, it becomes very clear, why current policies of universities seem so counter-intuitive. Their number one priority must be knowledge, and yet, they do nothing to support libraries.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 60
- Universities should provide as much money for sports programs as for their libraries. Do you agree or disagree? Give specific examples and reasons 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
While facing dilemma, of funding sports ...
^^^
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'dedicating the largest'.
Suggestion: dedicating the largest
... of the universities nowadays decide on dedicating largest portion of their budget to finance the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...disagree with this kind of approach and Im going to argue against it by illustrati...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t by illustrating following reasons: First of all, university is an education...
^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...effort and resources must be focused on students enlightenment. instead of doing so, mon...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Instead
...t be focused on students enlightenment. instead of doing so, money is simply wasted on ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...no positive outcome in the long run. Secondly, all the necessary infrastructu...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other hand is very hard to come by. Looking at there facts, it becomes very ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in short, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 1977.66487455 43% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 164.0 407.700716846 40% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18902439024 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 4.48103885553 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06558175444 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.756097560976 0.524837075471 144% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 618.680645161 42% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7049337145 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.625 5.45110844103 250% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17505915905 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635302618328 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401806816102 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917793710553 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127422947903 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.