What do you want most in a friend — someone who is intelligent, or someone who has a sense of humor, or someone who is reliable? Which one of these characteristics is most important to you? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice.
Every trait of a friend has it advantage and disadvantages for us, some people are trustworthy while others act like a comedian. An important part of each friendship is about the time one side gets in trouble, who can help you to solve issues? In my opinion, it's vital to have friends with active brains, more iq a person has, more better friend he/she could be. I will bring some reasons in the following essay to explore my experiences and Idea.
First of all, An intelligent friend is someone who you can have suitable moments with. There is no doubt about the effects of a person who benefits from convincing intelligence to our choices during the lifetime. A person with an up-normal strength in thinking behaves like a commander, sometime you must obtain his/her thoughts whithout asking questions. An example from my personal life can help to enlight the shadow of this matter, Kaveh is a PhD candidate in one of the best universities of the world, we were friends from childhood time. when I was in hesitate to buy an apartment in the capital city of Iran his advices assisted me to make a logical choice. I bought the house and it was a profitting business for me.
Secondly, a sense of humor or being reliable both are vital characteristics of somebody who can gain a long relationship with people. Nevertheless, some people have well manner in different situations, I stongly believe they are intelligent people! they prefer to change their state due to be the best person in a wide range of sitauation. For instance, a recent study in my country showed the relationship among two factors: IQ and social success. my interpretation of the results of this research is a good example, eq mainly defines as social inteligence but the interesting side of this subject is the connection of IQ and eq. A normal person with high level of IQ always have good point at eq.
To sum up, when it comes to assessing successfulness of contact with a friend, whe most consider the intelligence of both sides. Hence, I prefer to spend time with an intelligent person rather than any other kind of charecters.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 32, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'advantages'?
Suggestion: advantages
Every trait of a friend has it advantage and disadvantages for us, some people a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...th active brains, more iq a person has, more better friend he/she could be. I will bring so...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...d, we were friends from childhood time. when I was in hesitate to buy an apartment i...
^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d, we were friends from childhood time. when I was in hesitate to buy an apartment i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ly believe they are intelligent people! they prefer to change their state due to be ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...ong two factors: IQ and social success. my interpretation of the results of this r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, kind of, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7472826087 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82857332098 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592391304348 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9435755437 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.764705882 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156349726447 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490416466391 0.076458572812 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651013957834 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856933807005 0.150856017488 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408285027245 0.0645574589148 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.