What is the most useful way to help the natural environment?
Plant more trees and build parks
Stores stop providing plastic bags
Increase access to public transportation to reduce the number of cars on the road
Currently, with the excessive construction both in urban and rural areas, we human beings have exerted detrimental effects on the natural environment, thus at the aim of achieving sustainable development, firm measures ought to be taken by us to grapple with the serious environmental problems. Some citizens reckon that banning stores from providing plastic bags is the preferred option since it curbs the white contamination caused by the non-biodegradable chemical substance, while others contend that investment on public transits enables us to combat the environmental issue from roots by diminishing the emission of exhaust fumes. Personally speaking, I can hardly concur with these opinions. I harbor the idea that planing more trees and building parks is the best approach to deal with environmental problems and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, planting more trees plays a pivotal role in the air purification. It is widely acknowledged that owing to the development of the economy, there have been a myriad of factories emitting exhaust fumes generated by the combustion of fossil fuels. Meanwhile, private cars are also one of the dominant factors in intensifying the haze. Thus, innumerable carbon dioxide and other pollutants have been emitted into the atmosphere, which poses threat to city dwellers' respiratory health and haunts people for more than months. Since oxygen is an integral component in our daily lives, harnessing plants' photosynthesis effects is of crucial significance. In the process of photosynthesis effects, plants are capable of converting carbon dioxide absorbed from the atmosphere into oxygen, thus improving the air conditions and reducing the incidence of respiratory diseases. Compared to the solution of planting trees, distributing funds to build public transportation is likely to fail to combat environmental problems. To be more specific, owing to the vast investment required in constructing public transits, public transportation cannot cover all blocks in large cities, especially in metropolises. Meanwhile, the convenience offered by private cars is irreplaceable, for instance, the private space ensured by private car to talk freely. Thus city dwellers continue to resort to private cars and the emission of exhaust fumes cannot be lowered.
What's more, apart from the effect of air purification, trees also contribute to the well-being of the whole ecosystem. Concretely, with the exploitation of natural resources and logging, a vast number of nutrients embedded in soils have been washed away by not also rain but also inundation, therefore people take its toll on soil erosion. Under this circumstance, it is essential to planting trees. Trees, with innumerable roots, are capable of holding soil in place. Hence, they can put nutrients from the subsoils and drop organic materials to the earth, which makes a great contribution to the enhancement of soil fertileness. In addition, their bodies also play a critical role in improving environment situation. For instance, their bodies can be employed to block the wind.
Admittedly, constructing public transits and prohibiting the utilization of plastic bags are also conducive to the protection of the environment. Nevertheless, public transportation cannot address the issue from roots. Plus, ceasing to render plastic bags brings inconvenience to citizens' lives. Therefore, their merits seem lackluster.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, the most effective approach to help the natural environment is planting trees and constructing parks. For one thing, it prevents individuals from being enslaved by respiratory disease by generating fresh air. For another, it also exerts advantageous effects on soil preservation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | KshitijSingh | 90 | view |
- increase salaries to improve the quality of education 76
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Which do you prefer and why. 88
- If a city has given the money to investment, which options do you prefer listed in the following 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own or read or watch the news presented by those whose views are different from your own. 73
- The more money people have, the more money they should give away to charity 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1348, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... ensured by private car to talk freely. Thus city dwellers continue to resort to pri...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...n of exhaust fumes cannot be lowered. Whats more, apart from the effect of air puri...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'plant'?
Suggestion: plant
...r this circumstance, it is essential to planting trees. Trees, with innumerable roots, a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, for one thing, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 34.0 8.0752688172 421% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3202.0 1977.66487455 162% => OK
No of words: 572.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5979020979 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17688659548 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 314.0 212.727598566 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548951048951 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 987.3 618.680645161 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.94265232975 263% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1861242498 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89285714286 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189748817618 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472477934749 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501803829566 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100985046316 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304773958571 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 10.9000537634 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 86.8835125448 206% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 10.002688172 200% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.